2021
DOI: 10.1108/ils-07-2021-0061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing for others: the roles of narrative and empathy in supporting girls’ engineering engagement

Abstract: Purpose Science museums provide a context for developing and testing engineering activities that support visitors in creating personally meaningful objects. This study aims to propose that narrative design elements in such engineering activities can foster empathy to support engineering engagement among girls ages 7–14. Design/methodology/approach Taking a constructionist approach to engineering design, the authors present results from an observational study (n = 202 girls) of engineering activities across t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this revisit research was to develop a deeper understanding of changes in adolescents' preferred text genres and channels of communication and to chart a movement from a print logic to a participatory, ludic, modular way of communicating through mediums such as photo, film, maker/craft, etc. (Peppler et al., 2022). In tracing the shifts in these young people's preferred communicative modes, one of the things I found was the widespread influence of the digital screen and its inherent social interactions and relationships, that is, their experience of meaning‐making was hyperactive, hyper‐social, and multisensory (McLean, 2020).…”
Section: Research Design Background: Revisiting For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this revisit research was to develop a deeper understanding of changes in adolescents' preferred text genres and channels of communication and to chart a movement from a print logic to a participatory, ludic, modular way of communicating through mediums such as photo, film, maker/craft, etc. (Peppler et al., 2022). In tracing the shifts in these young people's preferred communicative modes, one of the things I found was the widespread influence of the digital screen and its inherent social interactions and relationships, that is, their experience of meaning‐making was hyperactive, hyper‐social, and multisensory (McLean, 2020).…”
Section: Research Design Background: Revisiting For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to expand understandings of girls' motivations for making and assess shifts in activity design are an ongoing topic of study within the literature on gender and making. Peppler et al (2021) found that designing for empathy and narrative-driven making made a difference in girls' participation in a museum makerspace. Similarly, Pinkard et al (2017) found that "interactive narratives motivated girls to continue with the challenging STEM activities and contrived a sense of authentic purpose to the work" (p. 506).…”
Section: Turning Toward Girls In Makerspace Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key to this are opportunities to become conscious of one's positioning in the world through the systems (e.g., White supremacy, cisheteropatriarchy, and capitalism) that shape what is made natural and could be remade to imagine other social possibilities (Buenavista et al, 2021). Peppler et al 's (2021) and Pinkard et al 's (2017) work on purposeful making, and Erete et al 's (2021) principles amplify how makerspaces will replicate social inequities unless they specifically integrate sociopolitical understandings of teaching, learning, gender, and intersectionality across curriculum, instruction, and interactions (McKinney de Royston et al, 2021). The details and pedagogical "how" of this work is a central focus of our paper.…”
Section: Reconsidering Gender In Research On Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two groups were assigned by teachers at the school based on student interest and willingness to participate in the study. Additionally, the age range was selected as research suggests elementary and middle school is when learners begin to form conceptions about engineering and interest toward the field [46]. All participants visited the Junior Maker Space at least once and most had some engineering experiences prior to joining the workshop.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%