2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing gene therapy vectors: avoiding immune responses by using tissue-specific promoters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 In the present study, we delivered both human and murine full-length dystrophin cDNAs under the control of a CMV promoter. The CMV promoter allows the expression of the dystrophin transgene in many cell types, 36 including professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). While the mechanism of crosspriming seems to be the most likely after intramuscular DNA injection, 37 it is probable that some APC present in the muscle are transfected and antigen expression in these APC primes MHC class I and II responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 In the present study, we delivered both human and murine full-length dystrophin cDNAs under the control of a CMV promoter. The CMV promoter allows the expression of the dystrophin transgene in many cell types, 36 including professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). While the mechanism of crosspriming seems to be the most likely after intramuscular DNA injection, 37 it is probable that some APC present in the muscle are transfected and antigen expression in these APC primes MHC class I and II responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] The viral promoters, such as human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early gene promoter, achieve high levels of nonspecific gene expression; in contrast, the use of the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter is specific to muscle tissue and can avoid the potentially harmful effects of ectopic transgene expression. [9][10][11][12] However, the MCK promoter is less active than viral promoters, and its large size (6.5 kb) makes it incompatible with adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors, a noteworthy gene delivery vehicle with a 4.5-kb capacity for the treatment of muscular dystrophies and other degenerative disorders. [13][14][15] We have shown previously that a truncated MCK promoter (enh358MCK, 584-bp) could achieve musclespecific expression of the human minidystrophin genes (3.8-4.2 kb) in dystrophin-deficient mdx mice, ameliorate pathologies and improve muscle contractile function in mdx mice.…”
Section: Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this is a legitimate explanation, cross-presentation does not appear to be a major route for CD8 ϩ T cell priming following i.m. injection of plasmid, which is the route used in the current study (34,35). Indeed, CD8…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%