2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-019-05131-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing High Entropy Alloys with Dual fcc and bcc Solid-Solution Phases: Structures and Mechanical Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, the CCA composition was selected based on its likelihood to provide significant performance in terms of both tribological and corrosion resistance. For tribological performance (e.g., resistance to erosion), a mixture of FCC and BCC structures would be expected to provide adequate performance as the FCC phase is expected to present a ductile nature while the opposite holds for a BCC crystal structure [14]. Resistance to corrosion is instead expected to be enhanced by elements such as Ni, Mo, and Cr, due to the formation of passive films on the alloys surface [15].…”
Section: Cca Composition Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the CCA composition was selected based on its likelihood to provide significant performance in terms of both tribological and corrosion resistance. For tribological performance (e.g., resistance to erosion), a mixture of FCC and BCC structures would be expected to provide adequate performance as the FCC phase is expected to present a ductile nature while the opposite holds for a BCC crystal structure [14]. Resistance to corrosion is instead expected to be enhanced by elements such as Ni, Mo, and Cr, due to the formation of passive films on the alloys surface [15].…”
Section: Cca Composition Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the most commonly used criterion for phase prediction in HEAs is VEC. [ 31,32 ] VEC for a multicomponent alloy can be defined as the weighted average of VEC of the constituent components [ 33 ] VEC=i=1nCifalse(VECfalse)iwith false(VECfalse)i being the VEC for the i th element. Presumably, the most widely accepted criterion for crystal structure prediction was given by Guo et al, who proposed that FCC is stable for VEC ≥ 8 and BCC is stable at VEC < 6.87.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary reason for such incorrect prediction with VEC may be the used threshold values of VEC criterion. Even though VEC is the most widely accepted criterion used for predicting the crystal structure of HEAs, [31,41] it suffers from the major limitation of low "correct classification rate" (CCR). [42] Low CCR means that although commonly used thresholds of VEC can predict the crystal structure, they do not offer much improvement to any randomly chosen threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Composition-specific features can further be developed from the Alloy specification Columns 3 to 27 correspond to the elemental compositions of the multi-component alloy while Column 28 corresponds to the number of elements making up the multi-component alloy system ( Num_of_Elem ). Columns 29 to 37 correspond to some typical empirical HEA design parameters [ 6 , 7 ] such as the density estimate ( Density_calc ), the enthalpy of mixing for a multi-component alloy system ( dH mix ), entropy of mixing of a multi-component alloy system ( dS mix ), melting temperature estimate ( T m ), valence electron concentration ( VEC ), atomic size difference ( δ ), and difference in Pauling negativities ( χ ),. While this article is limited to these typical parameters for succinctness, others can also be developed from the Alloy specifications [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] .…”
Section: Data Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%