2008
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0705503104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing payments for ecosystem services: Lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms

Abstract: Payments for ecosystem services (PES) policies compensate individuals or communities for undertaking actions that increase the provision of ecosystem services such as water purification, flood mitigation, or carbon sequestration. PES schemes rely on incentives to induce behavioral change and can thus be considered part of the broader class of incentive-or market-based mechanisms for environmental policy. By recognizing that PES programs are incentive-based, policymakers can draw on insights from the substantia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
384
0
36

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 634 publications
(420 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
384
0
36
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, one option is to strengthen top down monitoring and enforcement by, for example, by increasing the probability of detection of illegal activity ( in our model), though here weak governance and limited …scal resources devoted to conservation may hamper e¤orts to detect and punish those involved in illegal logging. Another option is to provide district governments with alternative sources of rents (r) -monies, for example, from REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) or PES (Payment for Environmental Services) schemes where district politicians and bureaucrats are, in e¤ect, paid not to cut down tropical forest (see, e.g., Jack et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one option is to strengthen top down monitoring and enforcement by, for example, by increasing the probability of detection of illegal activity ( in our model), though here weak governance and limited …scal resources devoted to conservation may hamper e¤orts to detect and punish those involved in illegal logging. Another option is to provide district governments with alternative sources of rents (r) -monies, for example, from REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) or PES (Payment for Environmental Services) schemes where district politicians and bureaucrats are, in e¤ect, paid not to cut down tropical forest (see, e.g., Jack et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence that beneficiaries will not continue to pay for water services unless these investments can be shown to generate and sustain intended benefits (Jack et al 2008;Porras et al 2013). Directly measuring a change in water service delivery through long-term paired watershed studies, evaluation of changing watershed response over time, or comparison among many similar watersheds (van der Velde et al 2013;Carlson et al 2014) is ideal.…”
Section: Implementing Programs For Water Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Payments for environmental services (PES) are a commonly used policy instrument throughout the world to help reach biodiversity conservation goals in agroecosystems (Ferraro and Kiss, 2002;Jack et al, 2008), despite the definition of PES has been for the most part implicit (Sommerville et al, 2009). An effective list of indicator species of distinct facets of biodiversity may represent a key tool to assess the status and trends of biodiversity and to quantify the ecological quality of a field (Wittig et al, 2006).…”
Section: Implementation For Biodiversity Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%