2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2019.100738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing radiation transport tests: Simulation-driven uncertainty-quantification of the COAX temperature diagnostic

Abstract: One of the difficulties in developing accurate numerical models of radiation flow in a coupled radiation-hydrodynamics setting is accurately modeling the transmission across a boundary layer. The COAX experiment is a platform design to test this transmission including standard radiograph and flux diagnostics as well as a temperature diagnostic measuring the population of excitation levels and ionization states of a dopant embedded within the target material. Using a broad range of simulations, we study the exp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we investigate the DD-VEF model's performance in capturing the radiation wavefront as it propagates through the spatial domain. Note that the F-C test mimics the class of supersonic radiation shock problems and experiments [72,96,97,98]. One measurement of importance in these experiments concerns the time it takes for the radiation wavefront to reach the radiation-drive-opposite side of the test material [72,97,98].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Next we investigate the DD-VEF model's performance in capturing the radiation wavefront as it propagates through the spatial domain. Note that the F-C test mimics the class of supersonic radiation shock problems and experiments [72,96,97,98]. One measurement of importance in these experiments concerns the time it takes for the radiation wavefront to reach the radiation-drive-opposite side of the test material [72,97,98].…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the F-C test mimics the class of supersonic radiation shock problems and experiments [72,96,97,98]. One measurement of importance in these experiments concerns the time it takes for the radiation wavefront to reach the radiation-drive-opposite side of the test material [72,97,98]. A measurement of accuracy based on this wavefront-arrival metric can be derived by comparing the TRT solution at the right boundary of the F-C test, where the radiation wavefront propagates towards.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This S N scheme has been compared in a radiationhydrodynamics setting to an implicit Monte Carlo transport scheme coupled to our same hydrodynamics package. In general, there is good agreement between these two methods (Fryer et al 2020), with only mild differences when modeling energy transport across material boundaries. These differences are minimal and believed to be due to artificial transport caused by the simplified re-emission term in the implicit Monte Carlo package.…”
Section: Radiation Hydrodynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 88%