Designing secure and lightweight user access to drone for smart city surveillance

Hussain, Sajid; Mahmood, Khalid; Khan, Muhammad Khurram; Chen, Chien‐Ming; Alzahrani, Bander A.; Chaudhry, Shehzad Ashraf

doi:10.1016/j.csi.2021.103566

Cited by 52 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Though several potential attacks were defended using this work, it lacks preservation of the location privacy and involves high communication cost. Hussain et al [35] proposed a three-factor authentication scheme. This work mainly compares the drawback of Wazid et al [21] but it involved high computational time.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A total of 3Ex e + 2Ex p + Ex h = 7.84 ms is required as the computational time at the D j side. The suggested work is compared with the related existing schemes such as Singh et al [30], Tian et al [31], Wazid et al [21], Gope et al [32], Zhang et al [33], Ever et al [34], and Hussain et al [35] schemes, respectively. The computational cost for the schemes [21,[30][31][32][33][34][35] are 9.6 ms, 9 ms, 18.2 ms, 19.04 ms, 18.2 ms, 31.64 ms, and 18.2 ms which are high when compared to the suggested work.…”

Section: Computational Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The suggested work is compared with the related existing schemes such as Singh et al [30], Tian et al [31], Wazid et al [21], Gope et al [32], Zhang et al [33], Ever et al [34], and Hussain et al [35] schemes, respectively. The computational cost for the schemes [21,[30][31][32][33][34][35] are 9.6 ms, 9 ms, 18.2 ms, 19.04 ms, 18.2 ms, 31.64 ms, and 18.2 ms which are high when compared to the suggested work. Similarly, a total of 4Ex e + Ex p + Ex h = 6.72 ms is required as the computational cost at the EU i side, whereas the prevailing schemes such as [21,[30][31][32][33][34][35] require 7.2 ms, 7 ms, 43.73 ms, 18.2 ms, 26 ms, 16.44 ms, and 41.13 ms, respectively.…”

Section: Computational Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Anonymous Mutual and Batch Authentication with Location Privacy of UAV in FANET

Rajasekaran¹,

Azees²,

Al‐Turjman³

et al. 2022

Drones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As there has been an advancement in avionic systems in recent years, the enactment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) has upgraded. As compared to a single UAV system, multiple UAV systems can perform operations more inexpensively and efficiently. As a result, new technologies between user/control station and UAVs have been developed. FANET (Flying Ad-Hoc Network) is a subset of the MANET (Mobile Ad-Hoc Network) that includes UAVs. UAVs, simply called drones, are used for collecting sensitive data in real time. The security and privacy of these data are of priority importance. Therefore, to overcome the privacy and security threats problem and to make communication between the UAV and the user effective, a competent anonymous mutual authentication scheme is proposed in this work. There are several methodologies addressed in this work such as anonymous batch authentication in FANET which helps to authenticate a large group of drones at the same time, thus reducing the computational overhead. In addition, the integrity preservation technique helps to avoid message alteration during transmission. Moreover, the security investigation section discusses the resistance of the proposed work against different types of possible attacks. Finally, the proposed work is related to the prevailing schemes in terms of communication and computational cost and proves to be more efficient.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Computational Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Computational Costmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Anonymous Mutual and Batch Authentication with Location Privacy of UAV in FANET

Rajasekaran¹,

Azees²,

Al‐Turjman³

et al. 2022

Drones

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Li et al [19] described a secure paradigm of message protection for RFID-based IoT. Hussain et al [7] designed a secure mechanism for smart cities.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IoT provides many advantages, including enhancing the degree of automation to improve the efficiency of time and resources and making more intelligent decisions using collected data. Now IoT is widely operated in numerous applications and environments such as industry [3,4], transportation [5,6], smart cities [7], medical care [8], etc. ere are many kinds of IoT devices, and sensors are the most common device of IoT.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Analysis of a Provable Secure Two-Factor Authentication Protocol for Internet of Things

Chen

Liu

et al. 2022

Security and Communication Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because sensor nodes are deployed in public areas, these sensors are easy to capture by adversaries. Once a sensor is stolen, the sensitive information stored in it is likely to be exposed. Accordingly, designing a secure authentication protocol should consider this issue. Sadri et al. recently proposed a two-factor authentication protocol with anonymity for wireless sensor networks. Unfortunately, we found that their protocol had a design flaw in the user and sensor authentication phase. Besides, their protocol can not resist stolen smart card attacks, sensor capture attacks, and user impersonation attacks. In addition, their protocol does not provide perfect forward security. This paper proposes a provably secure authentication to overcome these weaknesses and flaws. By comparing the security and performance of the proposed protocol with other related protocols, we find that our work has reasonable computation overhead and better security.

show abstract