Single-Case Methods in Clinical Psychology 2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315412931-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing single-case experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed data on patients’ cognitive performance is presented in Tables 1 , 2 . For patients who underwent surgery and had postoperative neuropsychological evaluation, we calculated reliable change indices at a 90% confidence interval ( Baxendale and Thompson, 2005 ; Morley, 2017 ). To compare patients in our sample experiencing greater and reduced postoperative cognitive decline, we separated the patients for whom the data was available into two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed data on patients’ cognitive performance is presented in Tables 1 , 2 . For patients who underwent surgery and had postoperative neuropsychological evaluation, we calculated reliable change indices at a 90% confidence interval ( Baxendale and Thompson, 2005 ; Morley, 2017 ). To compare patients in our sample experiencing greater and reduced postoperative cognitive decline, we separated the patients for whom the data was available into two groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the hypotheses, a visual analysis and reliable change analysis were used alongside the qualitative data obtained during the change interviews. The visual analysis explored changes between phases and over the course of the study [ 32 ]. Medians and interquartile ranges were calculated for screen time data for each phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been a recurring challenge for the field, 99 but the realisation that interventions increasingly require multiple inputs from several domains and cannot be easily evaluated in RCT formats is still to gain real traction. Many possible options have been proposed, 31,63,75,101,146,152 and they include the use of methods such as single-case design studies, pragmatic trials, and stepped wedge designs that are more feasible in clinical settings (see Keefe et al 75 for a recent review). Identifying “which treatments for which patients” remains a challenge in the pain field, 146,151 and from a biopsychosocial perspective, we might add, “under which conditions.” This review suggests we have made some progress in addressing these questions, but there is still some way to go.…”
Section: Summary and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%