2011
DOI: 10.1080/09523987.2011.607319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Designing social media into university learning: technology of collaboration or collaboration for technology?

Abstract: Using the example of an undergraduate unit of study that is taught both on-campus and externally, but uses Internet-based learning in both cases, we explore how social media might be used effectively in higher education. We place into question the assumption that such technologies necessarily engage students in constructivist learning; we argue that the affordances of social media must be complemented by social affordances, designed into the learning experience, which thereby generate the necessary connection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, research into the use of social technologies in higher education has primarily focused on understanding students' experiences and identifying the potential learning benefits that social technologies provide in educational settings (Augustsson, 2010;Tay & Allen, 2011). The recent studies that have examined lecturers' experiences have primarily focused on lecturers' reflections about the outcomes of using social technologies in higher education, rather than the processes by which lecturers appropriated those technologies for use in formal education (Waycott, Sheard, Thompson & Clerehan, 2013;Gray et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, research into the use of social technologies in higher education has primarily focused on understanding students' experiences and identifying the potential learning benefits that social technologies provide in educational settings (Augustsson, 2010;Tay & Allen, 2011). The recent studies that have examined lecturers' experiences have primarily focused on lecturers' reflections about the outcomes of using social technologies in higher education, rather than the processes by which lecturers appropriated those technologies for use in formal education (Waycott, Sheard, Thompson & Clerehan, 2013;Gray et al, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely believed that social technologies have the technological and educational capabilities to support teaching and learning (Augustsson, 2010;McLoughlin & Lee, 2007). Social technologies enable social awareness and facilitate interpersonal interaction, thus providing justification for adoption of these technologies in higher education (Tay & Allen, 2011;Thongmak, 2011;Yoder & Stutzman, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media fosters social constructivist learning (Tay and Allen, 2011). In addition, social media is part of everyday life for most learners who share ideas with others freely on social media platforms (Sauter et al, 2004).…”
Section: Social Softwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learners however do not spontaneously engage in productive social modes of collaboration (Cohen, 1994). They might engage in 'collective individualism' -splitting up team tasks into relatively equal components and then completing them as individuals, with relatively limited collective input (Tay and Allen, 2011). Further, they might try to quickly come to a consensus rather than critically discussing and referring to each other's contributions (Chinn and Brewer, 1993).…”
Section: Collaborative Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These also combined its use in enhancing learners" discussions for improving learning stimuli and experience; and taking individualized subject materials [17], [18], [19]. Moreover, some researchers stated that ICT educational tools and activities are very useful for improving learners" collaborative and cooperative skills [20], [21], [22].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%