The rising frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation events due to climate change poses a significant operational challenge for water management. The use of short-term precipitation forecasts in reservoir operations has long been recognized as an opportunity to mitigate these extremes (e.g., Kelman et al., 1990;Stedinger et al., 1984;Yao & Georgakakos, 2001). Advances in forecast-informed reservoir operations (FIRO) have gained traction as a risk-based approach that conditions release decisions on hydrologic ensemble forecasts to better manage reservoir flood pool levels, optimize surface and groundwater storage, and meet environmental flow regulations (Delaney et al., 2020;Jasperse et al., 2020;Nayak et al., 2018). While many FIRO approaches directly incorporate forecast uncertainty into the decision-making process, one remaining challenge is that the forecasts and their uncertainty are generally not tailored for the decision under consideration (Turner et al., 2017). For instance, water managers who prioritize safety from flood hazards over water supply concerns may prefer forecasts that reliably capture the occurrence of heavy precipitation and floods, even if this leads to more false alarms. This study advances the development of such tailored information using deep learning techniques to address spatial error in precipitation forecasts, with the goal of producing more flexible forecasting products to incorporate within adaptive operating policies (Giuliani et al., 2021;Herman et al., 2020).The accuracy of precipitation forecasts from numerical weather prediction models has significantly improved over the last several decades (Bauer et al., 2015), but structured forecast biases are still common (Wilks, 2019). Several sources of uncertainty cause forecast bias, including model design, parameterization, and initial conditions. To address these issues, many statistical post-processing techniques have been proposed to bias-correct forecasts. These techniques, broadly termed model output statistics (MOS; Wilks, 2019), have traditionally relied on multiple regression frameworks, although machine learning (ML) methods have recently been designed for this task (Cho et al., 2020;Han et al., 2021). Traditional MOS approaches correct biases in precipitation magnitude that can result from imprecise parameterizations or coarse model resolution. However, these approaches are usually not well suited to account for spatial biases in the forecasted location of large-scale storm systems, because they are conditioned on forecasted precipitation at a specific location.