2004
DOI: 10.1002/pc.20029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desirable features in mold filling simulations for Liquid Composite Molding processes

Abstract: Numerical simulations of the mold filling process in various Liquid Composite Molding (LCM) techniques, in which the fiber reinforcements represent the porous media and the polymeric resin is the impregnating fluid, have been successfully utilized for over a decade now, but they continue to be under dynamic development. Some of the recent applications are the increased emphasis on design optimization, control of the impregnation process and the rapid introduction of new LCM techniques such as the Vacuum Assist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematically, this is done by prescribing the cost function that will minimize the region with no resin in the mold. Evaluation of the cost function is performed with an existing numerical simulation called Liquid Injection Molding Simulation (LIMS) [30] which simulates the flow in any complex geometry in Liquid Molding. LIMS output provides the empty region after each fill based on the inputs of preform and DM permeability, race-tracking strengths along the edges and predefined inlet and vent locations.…”
Section: Methodology and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematically, this is done by prescribing the cost function that will minimize the region with no resin in the mold. Evaluation of the cost function is performed with an existing numerical simulation called Liquid Injection Molding Simulation (LIMS) [30] which simulates the flow in any complex geometry in Liquid Molding. LIMS output provides the empty region after each fill based on the inputs of preform and DM permeability, race-tracking strengths along the edges and predefined inlet and vent locations.…”
Section: Methodology and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 to find the DM layout to be placed on top of the preform so no voids are created [30]. The mesh representing the preform domain is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific investigations [2,13,14] carried out over the last 50 years on LCM techniques have provided experimental, analytical, and numerical methods to investigate mold filling for different LCM processes. Various software packages are nowadays available to carry out numerical simulations [15][16][17], which assist in defining an effective tool configuration, namely positioning inlet gates and vents. Different filling strategies and manufacturing parameters (injection pressure or flow rate, resin and mold temperatures, etc.)…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Composite engineers face three main challenges during Liquid Composite Molding (LCM) process development: comparing different injection processes and identifying the most suitable one (Challenge 1); finding an appropriate mold configuration (Challenge 2); and setting optimal values of process parameters (Challenge 3). The technical literature reports several methods to investigate mold filling in LCM [1][2][3][4], and various software packages have been developed to simulate resin injection for process design [5][6][7][8]. However, in common industrial practice, decisions on process feasibility and mold design are largely based on experience or made by trial and error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%