2009
DOI: 10.1177/1473095209102234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desiring Docklands: Deleuze and Urban Planning Discourse

Abstract: This article examines fundamental changes in the form and content of Melbourne Docklands planning discourse, between 1989 and 2003, which would seem to represent a radical departure from planning's `normal paradigm'. It draws on the philosophy of Deleuze and Guattari to provide an account of these changes, showing how the planning process moved from a grounding in site, history and community, through an unbounded, ungrounded and dream-like phase of `deterritorialization', to a phase of `reterritorialization' w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An assemblage is a dynamic set of relationships rather than a cluster of things; assemblage thinking in relation to cities involves a quest to understand how urban alliances, synergies and symbioses work. It has been developed as theory by DeLanda (2006DeLanda ( , 2016 among others and applied in a burgeoning (often bewildering) variety of ways in geography, urban planning and design (Dovey, 2106;Farias and Bender, 2010;McFarlane, 2011;McGuirk et al, 2016;Müller, 2015;Rankin, 2011;Simone, 2011;Wood, 2009). It has been variously identified with 'relational' (Jacobs 2012), 'material' (Rydin, 2014) and 'nonrepresentational' (Thrift, 2007) thinking.…”
Section: Assemblage Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assemblage is a dynamic set of relationships rather than a cluster of things; assemblage thinking in relation to cities involves a quest to understand how urban alliances, synergies and symbioses work. It has been developed as theory by DeLanda (2006DeLanda ( , 2016 among others and applied in a burgeoning (often bewildering) variety of ways in geography, urban planning and design (Dovey, 2106;Farias and Bender, 2010;McFarlane, 2011;McGuirk et al, 2016;Müller, 2015;Rankin, 2011;Simone, 2011;Wood, 2009). It has been variously identified with 'relational' (Jacobs 2012), 'material' (Rydin, 2014) and 'nonrepresentational' (Thrift, 2007) thinking.…”
Section: Assemblage Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this understanding, urban policymaking then becomes a practice aimed at managing the linkages between interventions. It is geared to instrumentally adapt boundaries and programmes to maintain certain visions of urban space (Wood, ). Conversely, a unitary view of space and time considers the city as permanently mutable.…”
Section: Self‐organized Urban Development: Disaggregation Of City‐regmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seoul, South Korea, used nature to revitalise an urban area by uncovering an important stream, Cheonggyecheon, that runs through the city, utilising the stream as a focus for urban redevelopment (see Shin and Lee, 2006;Kang and Cervero, 2009). The Docklands in Melbourne, Australia, have taken advantage of disused space near the city's waterfront and regenerated the area through heritage conservation, public art, business creation and tourism in a bid to expand the Central Business District (Dovey and Sandercock, 2002;Wood, 2009). Finally, Temple Bar in Dublin, Scenarios are a useful tool to help think about and visualise the future and, as such, are utilised by many policymakers and practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%