2008
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200704053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desorption Studies of Hydrogen in Metal–Organic Frameworks

Abstract: The diameter is decisive: Adsorption sites for hydrogen in the metal–organic frameworks Cu‐BTC, MIL‐53, MOF‐5, and IRMOF‐8 could be identified by using thermal desorption spectroscopy at very low temperatures (see graph). The correlation between the desorption spectra and the pore structure of these MOFs shows that at high hydrogen concentrations the diameter of the cavity determines the heat of adsorption.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The saturation uptake was found to be proportional to the specific surface area [9,10] and to the micropore volume [10][11][12]. The pore diameter seems to have a strong influence on the average enthalpy of adsorption [13][14][15], which in turn determines the temperature dependence of the hydrogen uptake. Nevertheless, in this work a great variety of different structures is evaluated for making sure that the results about the usable capacity are representative for all materials.…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The saturation uptake was found to be proportional to the specific surface area [9,10] and to the micropore volume [10][11][12]. The pore diameter seems to have a strong influence on the average enthalpy of adsorption [13][14][15], which in turn determines the temperature dependence of the hydrogen uptake. Nevertheless, in this work a great variety of different structures is evaluated for making sure that the results about the usable capacity are representative for all materials.…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[12,[24][25][26][27][84][85][86] In the former type, the small pores hinder diffusion of the H 2 molecules through ultramicropores of comparable size, because the interaction potential of the H 2 molecules is expected to be very strong due to the synergistic effect of the neighbouring pore walls. [19,76] Such a strong interaction leads to slow adsorption kinetics, resulting in adsorption/desorption hysteresis. On the other hand, in flexible pores, the hysteresis is attributed to additional steric hindrance caused by adjacent guests (kinetic trapping), where such slow desorption kinetics might be the result of the high H 2 loading of the porous framework at low pressures, which impedes the flexibility and window opening.…”
Section: Crystal Structures Of {[Zn(sif 6 )(Pyz) 2 ]·2meoh} N (2 ʛ 2mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] The other is pore-shape and -size design, where small pores show a relatively high affinity for H 2 . [19] On the basis of this background, we reasoned that frameworks with ultramicropores (with pore sizes smaller than 7 Å) might well contribute to gas separation and yield novel results on H 2 adsorption. Although several interpenetrated (interwoven) frameworks [12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] [30] and [Cu(SiF 6 )(4,4Ј-bpy) 2 ] n [31] with micropores of 7.5 ϫ 7.5 Å 2 and 8.0 ϫ 8.0 Å 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence MOFs with similar building units and network topology show, at low pressure, a storage capacity which is higher for the frameworks with smaller pores [96]. Moreover, thermal desorption studies of hydrogen adsorbed at 20 K in different MOFs indicate that the affinity between hydrogen and the MOFs is more influenced by the pore size than by the building units of the MOFs [107]. This result is obtained at hydrogen concentrations which are close to the maximum storage capacities; that is, at technologically relevant uptake values.…”
Section: Coordination Polymersmentioning
confidence: 94%