1996
DOI: 10.1006/icar.1996.0167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Despin Mechanism for Protogiant Planets and Ionization State of Protogiant Planetary Disks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
68
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
9
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perna, Menou & Rauscher ). The presence of magnetic fields in the protoplanet could also lead to a transfer of its angular momentum to a circumplanetary disc due to coupling of the planetary dipole field lines to the disc fluid, as discussed in Takata & Stevenson (). Although the Takata & Stevenson derivation applies only for the very last stage of the planet formation, when its radius is only a factor of 10 larger than its final value, the mechanism they describe can lead to the decreasing of L by a factor of 3–4 in this very last phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perna, Menou & Rauscher ). The presence of magnetic fields in the protoplanet could also lead to a transfer of its angular momentum to a circumplanetary disc due to coupling of the planetary dipole field lines to the disc fluid, as discussed in Takata & Stevenson (). Although the Takata & Stevenson derivation applies only for the very last stage of the planet formation, when its radius is only a factor of 10 larger than its final value, the mechanism they describe can lead to the decreasing of L by a factor of 3–4 in this very last phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurs when the magnetic Reynold's number is high or ≫ 1. For the disk with ionization state explored by Takata & Stevenson (1996), the magnetic Reynold's number is only large (> 1) in the outer layers (greater than a few vertical scale heights where ionization is produced mainly by galactic cosmic rays), and within a few planetary radii of the planet (due to thermal ionization). The magnetic field should primarily be important in these regions.…”
Section: Accretion Disk Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our picture, Io should have formed dry and its migration might have been stopped at the inner truncation radius of Jupiter's accretion disk, at a few Jupiter radii (Takata & Stevenson 1996). It did not form wet and then lose its water through tidal heating.…”
Section: Accretion and Migration Of Both Planets And Moonsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…For any given shutdown rate, we find a linear increase in the mass of solids at the time of moon formation shutdown as a function of planetary mass, in agreement with previous simulations for the solar system giants (Canup & Ward 2006;Sasaki et al 2010 Canup & Ward (2002) discuss the contribution of planetary luminosity to the disk's energy budget, but for their computations of the gas surface densities they ignore it. 8 An inner cavity can be caused by magnetic coupling between the rotating planet and the disk (Takata & Stevenson 1996), and it can be an important aspect to explain the formation of the Galilean satellites (Sasaki et al 2010). 9 This conclusion is similar to that proposed by the ME model, but for reasons that are very different.…”
Section: Accretion and Migration Of Both Planets And Moonsmentioning
confidence: 99%