1979
DOI: 10.1016/0146-664x(79)90035-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destriping LANDSAT MSS images by histogram modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spatial domain image convolution can be applied to rectify affected MODIS images, but important data can be lost due to image blurring. Users of other data products prone to striping -such as Landsat MSS (Multi-Spectral Scanner) images -have used techniques such as histogram matching, which are broadly applicable to MODIS imagery (Horn and Woodham, 1979). Several papers (Antonelli et al, 2004;di Bisceglie et al, 2009) have reported the use of the 'bow-tie effect' inherent to MODIS level 1b data as a form of data redundancy, facilitating the correction of data from the poorly calibrated detectors.…”
Section: Maximum Value Compositing (Mvc) Is a Class Of Compositing Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial domain image convolution can be applied to rectify affected MODIS images, but important data can be lost due to image blurring. Users of other data products prone to striping -such as Landsat MSS (Multi-Spectral Scanner) images -have used techniques such as histogram matching, which are broadly applicable to MODIS imagery (Horn and Woodham, 1979). Several papers (Antonelli et al, 2004;di Bisceglie et al, 2009) have reported the use of the 'bow-tie effect' inherent to MODIS level 1b data as a form of data redundancy, facilitating the correction of data from the poorly calibrated detectors.…”
Section: Maximum Value Compositing (Mvc) Is a Class Of Compositing Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then for each grey-level g 1 the grey-level g 2 is calculated for which f 1 (g 1 ) = f 2 (g 2 ) as shown in Fig. 2, and this is the result of histogram matching function M(g 1 ) = g 2 (Horn & Woodham, 1979).…”
Section: Histogram Specification (Matching)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMM was originally designed for Landsat [28], and equalizes cumulative histograms of radiance distributions per detector in order to correct offset, gain and nonlinearity. We believe that HMM is better than MM because it is able to correct nonlinearity, whereas MM cannot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%