2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2001.09700.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Destruction of Peripheral C‐Fibers Does Not Alter Subsequent Vagus Nerve Stimulation‐Induced Seizure Suppression in Rats

Abstract: Summary:Purpose: Early animal studies of the therapeutic mechanisms of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) suggested that seizure suppression requires maximal activation of small, unmyelinated vagal C fibers. However, effective therapeutic stimulation parameters appear to be subthreshold for these fibers in humans, and there are no clinical reports of the autonomic side effects that would be expected if these fibers were maximally activated. We report here that selective destruction of C fibers with capsaicin does n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
74
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation aligns with a previous observation from our laboratory that VNS at 250 μA was sufficient to reduce cortical excitability [20], while further increases did not yield additional effects. The observation that further increases in stimulation intensity produces no further effects supports the involvement of thick myelinated vagal type A afferents, which generally exhibit a more homogeneous threshold for activation than slowly conducting and less densely myelinated fiber types [34,35]. Thick myelinated vagal afferents additionally exhibit a threshold for electrical activation similar to that of efferent motor fibers innervating the laryngeal muscle, and laryngeal muscle-evoked potentials have thus been proposed as a marker for effective recruitment of vagal afferents during VNS [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This observation aligns with a previous observation from our laboratory that VNS at 250 μA was sufficient to reduce cortical excitability [20], while further increases did not yield additional effects. The observation that further increases in stimulation intensity produces no further effects supports the involvement of thick myelinated vagal type A afferents, which generally exhibit a more homogeneous threshold for activation than slowly conducting and less densely myelinated fiber types [34,35]. Thick myelinated vagal afferents additionally exhibit a threshold for electrical activation similar to that of efferent motor fibers innervating the laryngeal muscle, and laryngeal muscle-evoked potentials have thus been proposed as a marker for effective recruitment of vagal afferents during VNS [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The cervical level of the vagus nerve is comprised of myelinated A and B fibers, as well as unmyelinated C fibers [127,128]. There is considerabe diversity in morphological and functional parameters of the nerve from individual to individual, suggesting that optimal stimulation parameters may also vary [129,130].…”
Section: Optimizing Vns Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 A more recent study observed no effect on VNS-induced seizure suppression in response to selective destruction of C fibers with capsaicin. 28 Certainly, further investigation in this area is necessary to better assess the role of C fibers in VNS.…”
Section: Rationale and Mechanism Of Action Of Vns In Epilepsy Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%