2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40097-014-0144-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desulfurization of gasoline using novel mesoporous carbon adsorbents

Abstract: Ordered mesoporous carbon (OMC) adsorbents have been prepared using spherical SBA-16 mesoporous silica, as a template. The synthesized materials were studied by X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms. OMCs have been tested for adsorption of dibenzothiophene (DBT) as model sulfur compound from gasoline fuels. The OMC showed higher sulfur adsorption due to large mesopore volume and high specific surface area. The results confirm the significance of the adsorb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A calibration curve was prepared by preparing DBT solutions of different concentrations (10–100 ppm). A UV/visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV–160A Vis Spectrophotometer) was utilized to determine the absorbance of the prepared solutions at the specified wavelength (313 nm) 27,28 . Amount of the S‐containing compound per unit mass of adsorbent, q e (mg S/g), was determined using the following equation: qe=()C0qeVW, where C 0 and C e are the initial and equilibrium concentrations (ppm) of solute in the bulk phase, respectively; V is the volume of the solution; and W is the mass of the AC used (g).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A calibration curve was prepared by preparing DBT solutions of different concentrations (10–100 ppm). A UV/visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV–160A Vis Spectrophotometer) was utilized to determine the absorbance of the prepared solutions at the specified wavelength (313 nm) 27,28 . Amount of the S‐containing compound per unit mass of adsorbent, q e (mg S/g), was determined using the following equation: qe=()C0qeVW, where C 0 and C e are the initial and equilibrium concentrations (ppm) of solute in the bulk phase, respectively; V is the volume of the solution; and W is the mass of the AC used (g).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the samples have strong band at ∼3,430 cm −1 , which corresponds to characteristic bands of (-OH) [21]. The band around 1,730 cm −1 for GO related of the carboxylic acid Group (COO − ) [22], and the band at ∼1,620 cm −1 for GO assigned to (C=C) skeletal stretching. In addition, the band of ∼1,070 cm −1 for GO corresponds to the (C-O) vibration of various oxygen-containing group.…”
Section: Characterization Of Go and Go-sh As Adsorbentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In addition, Organosulfur compounds are causing significant corrosion problems in the pipelines, pumps, and the refining equipment, plus the deactivation of the catalyst in oil processing. Therefore, Organosulfur compounds removal is crucial in reducing their influence on air pollution, human health, and the environment .There are many traditional methods for desulphurization process; however, each method has advantages and disadvantages [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrodesulfurization (HDS) work on the elimination of non-aromatic organosulphur compounds and thiophene at high pressure, high temperature, and hydrogen environment; however, it is challenging to eliminate aromatic organosulfur compounds. Therefore, the main drawbacks of Hydrodesulfurization are the high operations cost and lower octane number due to olefins saturation [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%