28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2010
DOI: 10.2514/6.2010-5072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detached Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flow over a Partially Open Cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…K is a function of Mach number and equals to 0.55 (Aradag [1]). The parameter α is related to cavity geometry and has a value of 0.25 (Syed [2]). U ∞ is free-stream velocity, M ∞ is the free-stream Mach number, St is the Strouhal number, and m is the mode number of the cavity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…K is a function of Mach number and equals to 0.55 (Aradag [1]). The parameter α is related to cavity geometry and has a value of 0.25 (Syed [2]). U ∞ is free-stream velocity, M ∞ is the free-stream Mach number, St is the Strouhal number, and m is the mode number of the cavity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complexity of the flow mechanism in different cavity configurations, cavity flows are categorized based on mainly geometric specifications ( L / D ratio, L / W ratio), cavity flow phenomena, and Mach number as discussed by Syed [2]. Geometric specifications of the cavity region affect the flow propagation in the cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model constant is taken as C des ¼ 0.61. 43 More details can be seen in ANSYS Fluent Documentation. 42…”
Section: Computational Approaches Desmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the latter studies which focus on the flow physics, most of the former references adopted the turbulent flow over partially open cavity as a validation case for numerical approaches. Syed and Hoffmann [15] conducted detached eddy simulation for turbulent flow over a partially open cavity. Their work has mainly aimed at comparing three sub-grid scale turbulence models, namely the S-A, SST k-ω, and the realizable k-ε models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%