1986
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8442(86)90019-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detail fracture growth in rails: Test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of crack initiation is about 10-15 mm far from the side surface of the rail which is in contact with the wheel and 6-10 mm below the rail head [20,21]. These cracks seem to propagate towards the rail surface and to behave like original surface cracks after penetration [22]. Subsurface-initiated failures are the types of failures which are focused on this paper.…”
Section: Crack Types In Railsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of crack initiation is about 10-15 mm far from the side surface of the rail which is in contact with the wheel and 6-10 mm below the rail head [20,21]. These cracks seem to propagate towards the rail surface and to behave like original surface cracks after penetration [22]. Subsurface-initiated failures are the types of failures which are focused on this paper.…”
Section: Crack Types In Railsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upper bound reference curves for rail steels are proposed by a number of authors for both mode I and mixed mode loading (see, e.g. [64,104,113,114]). …”
Section: Final Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was calibrated from the original detail fracture growth test conducted on tangent track at FAST [6,7] and has been further verified and validated by comparison with results from additional experiments on curved track on the FAST High Tonnage Loop [8] and tests conducted through a joint international research effort supported by the Union of International Railways/World Executive Council [9,10]. The growth rate model estimates size progression for specified conditions, which include temperature differential.…”
Section: Defect Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%