2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/199/1/012007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed calculations on low-energy positron-hydrogen-molecule and helium-antihydrogen scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some UN method of models calculations published while the present letter was under review gave Z eff = 13.5 [12]. The same article also gave a Z eff ≈ 10 with an explicit H 2 wave function and the UN group did not make a clear statement about which result should be preferred [12]. Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some UN method of models calculations published while the present letter was under review gave Z eff = 13.5 [12]. The same article also gave a Z eff ≈ 10 with an explicit H 2 wave function and the UN group did not make a clear statement about which result should be preferred [12]. Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At present, all previous calculations significantly underestimate the low energy annihilation cross section. The most sophisticated calculations are the Kohn variational calculations performed by Armour and colleagues at the University of Nottingham (UN) [9,11,12]. Their most recent calculations significantly underestimate the annihilation cross section at thermal energies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that the results obtained using the method of modules are larger than those obtained without using this method. The vibrationally averaged value of Z eff (k), obtained using a Morse function, is 13.5 when obtained using the method of models and 9.7 without using this method [24,25]. Thus the value obtained with the method of models is closer to the experimental value of 14.6 [26] than that obtained without using it.…”
Section: Low-energy Positron-hydrogen-molecule Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However, this is not the case for HeH scattering. Cross sections forH loss through the three rearrangement reactions with products He +p + P s, Hep + e + and αp + P s − , respectively, are much smaller than forH loss by antiproton annihilation [37,25].…”
Section: Antihydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%