2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.2.014002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed hydrodynamic characterization of harmonically excited falling-film flows: A combined experimental and computational study

Abstract: We present results from the simultaneous application of planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), particle image velocimetry (PIV) and particle tracking velocimetry (PTV), complemented by direct numerical simulations, aimed at the detailed hydrodynamic characterization of harmonically excited liquid-film flows falling under the action of gravity. The experimental campaign comprises four different aqueous-glycerol solutions corresponding to four Kapitza numbers (Ka = 14, 85, 350, 1800), spanning the Reynolds nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(160 reference statements)
5
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agreement between experimental measurements and DNS results is in general very good, especially for the small Reynolds numbers, cases A1 (Re = 5.1) and B1 (Re = 7.5). At larger Reynolds numbers the flow field is strongly dependent on the local wave shape and can vary rapidly in space, as shown by the experimental measurements of Charogiannis et al (2017) for instance. Hence, in particular at the front of the solitary wave (see figure 12c), small differences in local film height and measurement position can lead to noticeable differences in the velocity profile.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The agreement between experimental measurements and DNS results is in general very good, especially for the small Reynolds numbers, cases A1 (Re = 5.1) and B1 (Re = 7.5). At larger Reynolds numbers the flow field is strongly dependent on the local wave shape and can vary rapidly in space, as shown by the experimental measurements of Charogiannis et al (2017) for instance. Hence, in particular at the front of the solitary wave (see figure 12c), small differences in local film height and measurement position can lead to noticeable differences in the velocity profile.…”
Section: Comparison Of Experimental and Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The experimental apparatus and methodologies developed to generate the film thickness and velocity data have been described extensively in our previous publications (Charogiannis et al , 2017, and therefore only a summary is presented here for the sake of clarity and completeness. A schematic of the experimental arrangement, itself an evolution of a previously developed set-up (Mathie et al 2013;Markides et al 2015), is depicted in figure 2.…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A slightly discrepancy in the velocity profile is observed at higher Reynolds number (=77). As shown by Charogiannis et al 54 , flow field inside the film strongly depends on the local wave shape that quickly vary in space at higher Re value. Subsequently, a small difference in the measuring location can results in a noticeable change in the velocity profile.…”
Section: Comparison With Experiments For Hydrodynamics Of Wavy Film Flowmentioning
confidence: 81%