2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed kinetic analysis of the effect of benzene–acetylene composition on the configuration of carbon nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 13 shows that adding acetylene to a benzene feed increases the nucleation rate, i.e., nuclei form earlier and faster in the process, exactly when a drop of acetylene concentration is also observed. Phenanthrene and pyrene (3-and 4-membered aromatics, respectively) form in parallel to increase nucleation, supporting that the acetylene-induced hydrogen-abstraction/carbon-addition (HACA) mechanism, responsible for the formation of PAH, is also linked to the increased branching of the aggregates [68]. This example shows how CB particle growth and aggregation are intimately related, although such evidence has been obtained under simplified process conditions different from those of the more complex industrial production processes.…”
Section: Formation Of Particles and Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 13 shows that adding acetylene to a benzene feed increases the nucleation rate, i.e., nuclei form earlier and faster in the process, exactly when a drop of acetylene concentration is also observed. Phenanthrene and pyrene (3-and 4-membered aromatics, respectively) form in parallel to increase nucleation, supporting that the acetylene-induced hydrogen-abstraction/carbon-addition (HACA) mechanism, responsible for the formation of PAH, is also linked to the increased branching of the aggregates [68]. This example shows how CB particle growth and aggregation are intimately related, although such evidence has been obtained under simplified process conditions different from those of the more complex industrial production processes.…”
Section: Formation Of Particles and Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Benzene, acetylene, hydrogen, phenanthrene, pyrene, and nuclei mole fractions change during pyrolysis of 1% benzene in nitrogen (a), and the same with the addition of 0.5% acetylene (b). Reproduced and adapted from reference[68].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experiments performed in tubular reactors using lower acetylene conversion showed good agreement between experimental and modeled data, and the same evolution when conversion increased [38]. as soot, which is not considered in the model [42,43]. Therefore the order of magnitude of the PAHs calculated by the kinetic model might be overestimated.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Kinetic Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The calculated aggregates were similar in shape to those of carbon black obtained by benzene pyrolysis, and the calculated results of the fractal dimension were in good agreement with experimental results (Hayashi et al 1999). The AMP model can follow the particle trajectories of individual particles and clusters because Brownian motion is not modeled using a stochastic model such as a sectional method (Bhatt and Lindstedt 2009;Blacha et al 2012;D'Anna and Kent 2008;Dworkin et al 2011;Iyer et al 2007;Lindstedt and Waldheim 2013;Ono et al 2014a;Park and Rogak 2004;Zhang et al 2009a, b) or the PAH-PP model (Celnik et al 2008(Celnik et al , 2009Chen et al 2013;Sander et al 2011), but modeled using an aggregate mean free path. In stochastic models, the collision diameter of a particle and an aggregate is calculated using a constant fractal dimension, for which the realistic aggregate morphology is considered (Sander et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sectional approach (Bhatt and Lindstedt 2009;Blacha et al 2012;D'Anna and Kent 2008;Dworkin et al 2011;Iyer et al 2007;Lindstedt and Waldheim 2013;Ono et al 2014a;Park and Rogak 2004;Zhang et al 2009a, b) is a powerful tool and widely used to calculate particle size distributions (PSDs) of soot. The great advantage of this technique is that any kind of size distribution can be captured and that different sized particles may have different properties (Blacha et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%