2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2005.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed review of transgenic rodent mutation assays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
316
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 420 publications
5
316
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the lacZ model does not permit the detection of gene mutations in the ovum per se, Douglas described a method to detect lacZ mutations in granulosa cells, which provide the immediate environment for the ovum in female mice [Yauk et al, 2005]. Lambert et al [2005] have reviewed the use of transgenic rodent assays, including their use in germ-cell studies.…”
Section: Open Discussion Session 2 Research Recommendations For Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the lacZ model does not permit the detection of gene mutations in the ovum per se, Douglas described a method to detect lacZ mutations in granulosa cells, which provide the immediate environment for the ovum in female mice [Yauk et al, 2005]. Lambert et al [2005] have reviewed the use of transgenic rodent assays, including their use in germ-cell studies.…”
Section: Open Discussion Session 2 Research Recommendations For Assesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenic models using reporter genes have the relative advantage of measuring gene mutation directly in sperm; however, such models permit only gene (and not chromosomal) mutations to be measured; the reporter gene is not expressed [Lambert et al, 2005].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data show that because independent mutation events can be distinguished, in situ imaging provides a more sensitive method for determining environmentally induced mutations in adult tissues. Interestingly, many previously published mutation studies have been done by analyzing DNA from disaggregated tissue (e.g., Aprt, Tk, Big Blue, Muta Mouse, GptD), [53][54][55] an approach that limits information about the clonal relationship among mutant cells. The observation that in situ analysis is more sensitive than tissue disaggregation for detecting environmentally induced mutations raises the possibility that previous studies of disaggregated tissues may underestimate the impact of some environmental exposures.…”
Section: Advantages Of In Situ Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lacZ and lacI transgenic rodent systems have proved to be appropriate models for in vivo mutagenesis before tumors develop [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%