2012
DOI: 10.1021/ie202520a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed Scheduling of Single-Source Pipelines with Simultaneous Deliveries to Multiple Offtake Stations

Abstract: Continuous formulations for the scheduling of single-source refined-product pipelines with multiple distribution terminals have already been published. They help the scheduler make key operating decisions such as the sequence of batch injections at the input station, the batch sizes, the start and end times of pumping runs, and the set of aggregate product deliveries to perform during each run. In this way, the aggregate pipeline schedule is defined. However, the scheduler has yet to decide not only on the ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained were compared to those reported in a previous work (CAFARO et al, 2012) in which the pumping costs were assumed to be independent from the pump rate. When pumping energy charges associated to the head loss inside the pipeline are taken into account, the flow rate is more stable all along the time-horizon, and important savings are obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results obtained were compared to those reported in a previous work (CAFARO et al, 2012) in which the pumping costs were assumed to be independent from the pump rate. When pumping energy charges associated to the head loss inside the pipeline are taken into account, the flow rate is more stable all along the time-horizon, and important savings are obtained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by the objective function, the aim is to minimize energy consumption, stoppage and restart costs. To demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach, the given solution will be compared with that obtained by Cafaro et al (2012), in which the pumping costs were not taken into account. Figure 2 presents the aggregate schedule to be decomposed into detailed operations through the proposed MILP model.…”
Section: A Real World Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, MirHassani et al [14] presented an MILP model for scheduling a unidirectional pipeline with one source and multiple DCs, some of which were able to receive and inject the products. Cafaro et al [15] provided a new model for scheduling a pipeline with single source and many DCs, which could receive batches simultaneously. Recently, the pipeline systems with more complexity have been studied.…”
Section: Background Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed mathematical formulation is based on the work of Cafaro et al (2012). The main differences between this work and the model of Cafaro et al (2012) are as follows: (a) Our approach relies on a system with a single-source tree-structured pipeline network, whereas their approach assumes a single source pipeline network without any branch, (b) Our approach treats the case of multi-delivery to output terminals, whereas their approach considers the single delivery, and (c) their approach performs the pipeline input and output operations in two steps, whereas our approach seeks to find both of them in a single step.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cafaro et al (2012) presented a new MILP continuous formulation for the scheduling of a single-source pipeline considering the simultaneous deliveries at the output terminals to reduce the number of stoppages and restarts of the pipeline segments. However, the model they proposed has focused on the single-delivery for all depots, i.e., in each pumping run, just a single product can be transferred to each active output terminal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%