Detailing spaces and processes of resistance: Working women in Dundee’s jute industry

Abstract

Recent and ongoing calls within labour geography and social and cultural geography have highlighted the importance of resistance, its spatial productions and manifestations. However, within these, the geographical history of the factory system has been largely overlooked. Drawing upon Foucauldian theorisings in the fields of management and organisation, together with recent writings on the geographies of resistance, this paper takes Dundee's jute industry at the turn of the twentieth century as its focus and explores how the workplace itself, and the very workplace discipline used to ensure a productive, efficient and hardworking workforce, engendered workplace protest among the industry's working women. Writing through a number of modes and scales of protest within the workplace, within and between work groups, departments, mills and factories, and across the city, this paper adheres to an approach that carefully details the spaces and processes of resistance, paying careful attention to how union and non-union resistances operated and the geographies they worked through and created.

Reconfiguring Sovereignty in Foucauldian Genealogies of Power: The Case of English Master and Servant Law and the Dispersion and the Exercise of Sovereignty in the Modern Age

“…Foucault and his successors found these techniques artfully advanced in the factory in which workers were bound to the production apparatus to maximize their performance (: 142–144; : 78; Hoskin and Macve , ; Walsh and Stewart ; Wainwright , , b). When Foucault compared this dense mesh of binding, peering and rules that had been thrown over the factory floor to the fabrics of discipline that cover many other institutions he found its weave to be similar in pattern and purpose.…”

Pupils or prisoners? Institutional geographies and internal exclusion in UK secondary schools

“…The Seclusion Unit is organised to maximise the supervisor's view – a configuration that promotes regulation through visibility, as subjects are unrelentingly exposed to the gaze of others. Mirroring the classic Panoptic gaze, the layout of space is essential to these exercises of power and control (Philo and Parr 2000; Wainwright 2007; Pike 2008). The surveillance within the Unit clearly links into different scalar strategies of surveillance of young people.…”

“…Just as space is actively organised to produce particular subjects, space is also important in enabling resistance (Thomson 2005; Wainwright 2007). There are a number of examples that show Secluded students are not simply passive individuals subjected to discipline, regulation and control.…”

Spaces and Scales of African Student Activism: Senegalese and Zimbabwean University Students at the Intersection of Campus, Nation and Globe

“…Forging spaces of connection (such as the “convergence spaces” identified by Routledge 2003) may allow distinct social groups to mobilise around an issue (see Harvey 1985), particularly where, for instance, students occupy social spaces in which they share structural constraints with other groups. Conversely, activists may construct segregated spaces, or “subaltern counter publics” (Fraser 1990); sheltered political spaces in which the marginalized can gain voice (Wainwright 2007). These spaces of connection and segregation need not imply physical proximity or distance.…”