In an earlier journal paper, we have presented the results of a comparison of the performance of five entropy‐based denial‐of‐service detectors (Shannon, Rényi, Tsallis, Bhatia‐Singh, and Ubriaco). The dataset used in that evaluation was generated using simulation. The best performance in terms of detection rate showed Rényi and Bhatia‐Singh detectors. In terms of the detection delay, the best detector was Ubriaco. In this paper, we decided to repeat the evaluation, but this time using a dataset generated using emulation. In this evaluation, the Tsallis entropy‐based detector showed the best performance, followed by the Bhatia‐Singh detector. It can be concluded that both evaluations show the advantage of the detectors based on generalized entropies, compared to the Shannon‐based one, and that Bhatia‐Singh detector in both evaluations performed very well. Another conclusion is that in terms of the detection rate, the flow size distribution outperforms the source port distribution, but in terms of the detection delay, the situation is the opposite.