Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association For Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) 2017
DOI: 10.18653/v1/p17-1066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detect Rumors in Microblog Posts Using Propagation Structure via Kernel Learning

Abstract: How fake news goes viral via social media? How does its propagation pattern differ from real stories? In this paper, we attempt to address the problem of identifying rumors, i.e., fake information, out of microblog posts based on their propagation structure. We firstly model microblog posts diffusion with propagation trees, which provide valuable clues on how an original message is transmitted and developed over time. We then propose a kernel-based method called Propagation Tree Kernel, which captures high-ord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
382
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(386 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
382
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate the proposed model on three real-world data collections: Weibo [10], Twitter15 [7] and Twitter16 [7], which were originally collected from the most popular social media website in China and the U.S. respectively.…”
Section: A Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We evaluate the proposed model on three real-world data collections: Weibo [10], Twitter15 [7] and Twitter16 [7], which were originally collected from the most popular social media website in China and the U.S. respectively.…”
Section: A Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies on automatically detecting rumors mainly focused on designing effective features from various information sources, including text content [1]- [3], publisher's profiles [1], [4] and propagation patterns [5]- [7]. However, these feature-based methods are extremely time-consuming, biased, and labor-intensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of social media has enabled the phenomenon of "fake news," which could target specific individuals and can be used for deceptive purposes (Lazer et al, 2018;Vosoughi et al, 2018). As manual fact-checking is a time-consuming and tedious process, computational approaches have been proposed as a possible alternative (Popat et al, 2017;Wang, 2017;Mihaylova et al, 2018), based on information sources such as social media (Ma et al, 2017), Wikipedia (Thorne et al, 2018), and knowledge bases (Huynh and Papotti, 2018). Fact-checking is a multi-step process (Vlachos and Riedel, 2014): (i) checking the reliability of media sources, (ii) retrieving potentially relevant documents from reliable sources as evidence for each target claim, (iii) predicting the stance of each document with respect to the target claim, and finally (iv) making a decision based on the stances from (iii) for all documents from (ii).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since both the content modeling and homogeneity discovery part of our modeling fall into the Bayesian nonparametric framework, the posterior inference of our model can be done using the variational Bayes methods [23]. We train our model on a real-world Twitter dataset [36,37,39] that consists of user posting and sharing with true and false news stories. Our main contributions and the findings through the experiments are as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By incorporating the label information of the news stories, the supervised formulation of our model performs the classification task of predicting the labels of the news stories. There are feature-based methods that leverage text, social network, temporal traces and propagation models to classify true and false news in supervised fashion [39,50,20,29,72,70,31,32]. Also, another line of research focuses on devising algorithms that mitigate false news and their diffusion in social networks [9,64,48,27,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%