2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-74611-7_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Abnormalities on Displays of Patient Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Burdick et al demonstrated a higher accuracy of alarm identification with the use of multisensory (auditory, vibrotactile, and visual) alarms, compared to conventional [11]. Fleishman et al 2021 demonstrated that critical alert detection was faster with a multisensory (visual and auditory) alarm, compared to unisensory [13]. Both studies suggest that multisensory alarm systems had the potential to reduce the auditory burden associated with auditory alarms, as well as allow medical personnel to identify events more accurately and more rapidly when multiple, cognitively demanding sensory stimuli were present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burdick et al demonstrated a higher accuracy of alarm identification with the use of multisensory (auditory, vibrotactile, and visual) alarms, compared to conventional [11]. Fleishman et al 2021 demonstrated that critical alert detection was faster with a multisensory (visual and auditory) alarm, compared to unisensory [13]. Both studies suggest that multisensory alarm systems had the potential to reduce the auditory burden associated with auditory alarms, as well as allow medical personnel to identify events more accurately and more rapidly when multiple, cognitively demanding sensory stimuli were present.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%