2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting and quantifying field-related spatial variation of soil organic carbon using mixed-effect models and airborne imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SOC patterns in fields covering the hill slope from the crest to the foot slope showed patterns related to erosion of C associated with the topsoil. Stevens et al (2015) further demonstrated the importance of land management on SOC content. Their residual maximum likelihood model (REML) applied to the SOC map produced from the AHS160 flight over Luxembourg predicted that a field effect accounted for 48 ± 8% of the variance in SOC content in a cluster of fields (Fig.…”
Section: Quality Of the Predicted Soil Property Mapsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SOC patterns in fields covering the hill slope from the crest to the foot slope showed patterns related to erosion of C associated with the topsoil. Stevens et al (2015) further demonstrated the importance of land management on SOC content. Their residual maximum likelihood model (REML) applied to the SOC map produced from the AHS160 flight over Luxembourg predicted that a field effect accounted for 48 ± 8% of the variance in SOC content in a cluster of fields (Fig.…”
Section: Quality Of the Predicted Soil Property Mapsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This paper showed that these prediction uncertainty maps may be used to better Fig. 3 Predicted SOC maps (left) from the AHS 160 campaign in Luxembourg (Stevens et al 2010) and (right) using a residual maximum likelihood model (Stevens et al 2015) 1 3 characterize the quality of the soil properties mapping results, mask no-soil pixels and define the soil sampling and the calibration dataset.…”
Section: Quality Of the Predicted Soil Property Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we found that the largest difference in SOC between DL and PF was observed in regions with mean annual temperatures >10 C, mean annual precipitation in the range of 600-1200 mm, or elevation in the range of 0-500 m. This may be attributed to the greater differences in carbon input, decomposition rate of organic material, and field managements between DL and PF in the regions. Different SOC changes (Stevens et al, 2015). This study found that PF had higher SOC content than DL across different soil depths and cropping systems (Figure 4).…”
Section: Effects Of Different Farmland Utilization Types On Soc In Di...mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In this study, farmland SOC was influenced not only by natural environmental factors but also by cropping systems. Cropping systems can directly influence the content and distribution of SOC, as well as indirectly affect its synthesis and decomposition by interacting with other factors (Stevens et al, 2015). This study found that PF had higher SOC content than DL across different soil depths and cropping systems (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A feature of ecological integrity is self-organization capacity [21]. The greater the self-organization capacity of a system, the greater is its ability to maintain organization and resist perturbations.…”
Section: Framework For Evaluation Of Landscape Ecological Integritymentioning
confidence: 99%