2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting anomalies in people’s trajectories using spectral graph analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheriyadat et al [11] tracks low level features using optical flow and those feature trajectories were clustered to find dominant motion. Calderara et al [12] proposed to track each person in a crowd and to extract their trajectories to represent those as sequences of transitions between nodes in a graph and they developed invariant distance measures to detect anomalous trajectories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheriyadat et al [11] tracks low level features using optical flow and those feature trajectories were clustered to find dominant motion. Calderara et al [12] proposed to track each person in a crowd and to extract their trajectories to represent those as sequences of transitions between nodes in a graph and they developed invariant distance measures to detect anomalous trajectories.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, one category of the existing approaches is based on trajectory, such as [17][18][19][20][21]. These methods analyze trajectories, which are obtained via tracing amorphous blobs through consecutive video frames, constructing a normal motion model and detecting any trajectories with major deviation from the learned model as anomalous.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can obtain abnormalities [5] from the reconstructed document by using the distance measure proposed in [10]. However, this measure does not take into account the spatial locality of the anomaly.…”
Section: Localized Abnormality Measurementioning
confidence: 99%