“…It is now more common for EIS measurements to be acquired using four-electrode cells, which allows for better control of the applied potential and reduction of undesired impedance artifacts that arise in two-electrode measurements. − The expectation is that the applied AC current flows from one working electrode through the ion-selective membrane to another working electrode, while the resulting AC voltage across the ion-selective membrane is observed with two separate reference electrodes. However, as discussed in this contribution, four-electrode EIS may also suffer from artifacts (i.e., features in the EIS spectra that are not associated with the sensing membrane but result from the measuring electrodes and/or instrumentation), which may or may not be apparent to the user. ,, Moreover, even though four-electrode cells are generally expected to provide data of higher quality, they are often avoided by users due to the difficulty of introducing a fourth electrode into an existing device, as for example in the case of solid-contact ISEs. − This has led to numerous reports of EIS with three-electrode cells, which exhibit their own artifacts. − In addition, many reports that include EIS characterization of ISEs lack experimental details, often not even mentioning the number of electrodes used. Curiously, the first publication on EIS of ISE membranes shows a four-electrode cell, but data from two-electrode measurements are presented …”