Abstract:This study examines possible existence of business cycle asymmetries in Canada, France, Japan, UK, and USA real GDP growth rates using neural networks nonlinearity tests and tests based on a number of nonlinear time series models. These tests are constructed using in-sample forecasts from artificial neural networks (ANN) as well as time series models. Our study results based on neural network tests show that there is statistically significant evidence of business cycle asymmetries in these industrialized count… Show more
“…These include forecasting financial and economic time series ; stock price predictions (Tsang et al, 2007); mutual fund asset value forecasting (Chiang et al, 1996); and a comparison of artificial neural network and time series models for forecasting commodity prices (Kohzadi et al, 1996;Shahwan and Odening, 2007); electronic commerce systems for selling agricultural products (Wen, 2007); short-term food price forecasting (Haofei et al, 2007); forecasting hog prices (Hamm and Brorsen, 1997); forecasting residential property prices (Wilson et al, 2002); cost functions predictions (Fleissig et al, 2000); business cycle asymmetries and GDP growth rates (Kiani, 2005); and a review of neural network applications in finance (Wong et al, 1997;Wong and Selvi, 1998). Water economics.…”
Uncertain water allocations and water trading prices are a key constraint to efficient irrigated cropping and water trading decisions. This study shows that neural network models can reasonably forecast seasonal allocations and trading prices in water markets. These models can complement other forecasting techniques such as regression analysis and time series models as the former can better capture the non-linearities in the water trading system. Using a 50% probability risk factor for water variability, the water allocation model showed minor estimation error; however, in one instance the model underestimated the water allocation by 21%. This may be due to exceptionally low initial water allocations and borrowing of water from future years which was outside the training data sets. Similarly, the water trading price forecast model showed modest estimation error of about 11% during 2004/05 probably due to drought. Overall the models have good water allocation and price forecasting accuracy, and the determinants of water trading prices identified by the neural network models are those expected of the econometric models/economic theory.
“…These include forecasting financial and economic time series ; stock price predictions (Tsang et al, 2007); mutual fund asset value forecasting (Chiang et al, 1996); and a comparison of artificial neural network and time series models for forecasting commodity prices (Kohzadi et al, 1996;Shahwan and Odening, 2007); electronic commerce systems for selling agricultural products (Wen, 2007); short-term food price forecasting (Haofei et al, 2007); forecasting hog prices (Hamm and Brorsen, 1997); forecasting residential property prices (Wilson et al, 2002); cost functions predictions (Fleissig et al, 2000); business cycle asymmetries and GDP growth rates (Kiani, 2005); and a review of neural network applications in finance (Wong et al, 1997;Wong and Selvi, 1998). Water economics.…”
Uncertain water allocations and water trading prices are a key constraint to efficient irrigated cropping and water trading decisions. This study shows that neural network models can reasonably forecast seasonal allocations and trading prices in water markets. These models can complement other forecasting techniques such as regression analysis and time series models as the former can better capture the non-linearities in the water trading system. Using a 50% probability risk factor for water variability, the water allocation model showed minor estimation error; however, in one instance the model underestimated the water allocation by 21%. This may be due to exceptionally low initial water allocations and borrowing of water from future years which was outside the training data sets. Similarly, the water trading price forecast model showed modest estimation error of about 11% during 2004/05 probably due to drought. Overall the models have good water allocation and price forecasting accuracy, and the determinants of water trading prices identified by the neural network models are those expected of the econometric models/economic theory.
“…However, over fitting issues associated with neural networks can be eliminated with careful construction of the neural network architecture. Therefore, as recommended in Kiani (2005), and the studies cited therein, we incorporated a small number of biased nodes in our neural network models so as to avoid overfitting issues associated with neural network approximations. Likewise, we are interested in the accurate forecasts from the model rather than parameter estimates because in this study we seek to predict changes in forward foreign exchange rates in British pound, Canadian dollar, and Japanese yen.…”
“…Therefore, in the present research, we employ fewer hidden nodes 2 in our neural networks as was recommended in Kiani (2005) and Kastens et al (1995), since neural networks with fewer hidden nodes have better generalization and less over fitting problems, although there are number of rules of thumbs for selecting biased or hidden nodes for neural networks models. For example, Lippmann (1987) suggested 2n + 1 nodes, Wong (1991) 2n, Tang andFishwick (1993) n, andKang (1991) recommended n/2 hidden nodes but suggested trial and error as the best way for selecting the number of hidden nodes for a neural network model.…”
Section: Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qi and Wu (2003), who employ an ANN model with monetary fundamentals, find that their model cannot beat the random walk model. Alternatively, Kiani (2005) and Kiani et al (2005) used ANN models with macroeconomic time series and found that they outperformed the linear as well as other nonlinear models they employed. Lisi and Schiavo (1999) perform a detailed comparison of neural network and chaotic models for predicting monthly exchange rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead we employ an alternative strategy of selecting a minimum number of hidden nodes due toKiani (2005) andKastens et al (1995) to avoid the overfitting problem in our neural networks. Moreover, rather than employing neuro-coefficient smooth transition autoregression (NCSTAR) due toMedeiros and Veiga (2000), we employ various types of recurrent neural network models as was done due toTenti (1996) and others.…”
Summary
Prediction of exchange rates has been a topic for debate in economic literature since the late 1980s. The recent development of machine learning techniques has spurred a plethora of studies that further improves the prediction models for currency markets. This high‐tech progress may create challenges for market efficiency along with information asymmetry and irrationality of decision‐making. This technological bias emerges from the fact that recent innovative approaches have been used to solve trading tasks and to find the best trading strategies. This paper demonstrates that traders can leverage technological bias for financial market forecasting. Those traders who adapt faster to the changes in market innovations will get excess returns. To support this hypothesis we compare the performance of deep learning methods, shallow neural networks with baseline prediction methods and a random walk model using daily closing rate between three currency pairs: Euro and US Dollar (EUR/USD), British Pound and US Dollar (GBP/USD), and US Dollar and Japanese Yen (USD/JPY). The results demonstrate that deep learning achieves higher accuracy than alternate methods. The shallow neural network outperforms the random walk model, but cannot surpass ARIMA accuracy significantly. The paper discusses possible outcomes of the technological shift for financial market development and accounting conforming also to adaptive market hypothesis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.