2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-82199-9_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting CAN Bus Intrusion by Applying Machine Learning Method to Graph Based Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of Dataset 2, DT achieves a higher level of accuracy by 1.74% compared to [ 21 ]. While compared to [ 31 ], the accuracy that has been achieved using KNN for Dataset 1 is 1.74% greater than that of accuracy achieved in [ 32 ]. In addition, the F1 score of SVM and KNN of our proposed study is higher than [ 32 ] for both datasets.…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of Dataset 2, DT achieves a higher level of accuracy by 1.74% compared to [ 21 ]. While compared to [ 31 ], the accuracy that has been achieved using KNN for Dataset 1 is 1.74% greater than that of accuracy achieved in [ 32 ]. In addition, the F1 score of SVM and KNN of our proposed study is higher than [ 32 ] for both datasets.…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…While compared to [ 31 ], the accuracy that has been achieved using KNN for Dataset 1 is 1.74% greater than that of accuracy achieved in [ 32 ]. In addition, the F1 score of SVM and KNN of our proposed study is higher than [ 32 ] for both datasets. However, for the accuracy of SVM with Dataset 2 in our proposed study, it is a little bit lower than [ 21 , 32 ].…”
Section: Performance Analysis and Future Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations