2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1907.05417
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting composite orders in layered models via machine learning

W. Rzadkowski,
N. Defenu,
S. Chiacchiera
et al.

Abstract: We use machine learning to study layered spin models where composite order parameters may emerge as a consequence of the interlayerer coupling. We focus on the layered Ising and Ashkin-Teller models, determining their phase diagram via the application of a machine learning algorithm to the Monte Carlo data. Remarkably our technique is able to correctly characterize all the system phases also in the case of hidden order parameters, i.e. order parameters whose expression in terms of the microscopic configuration… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…for fermionic theories in [7,11]. The approach also enables novel procedures, such as learning by confusion and similar techniques, to locate phase transitions in a semi-supervised manner [15,34]. For lattice QCD, action parameters can be extracted from field configurations [24].…”
Section: Yukawa Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for fermionic theories in [7,11]. The approach also enables novel procedures, such as learning by confusion and similar techniques, to locate phase transitions in a semi-supervised manner [15,34]. For lattice QCD, action parameters can be extracted from field configurations [24].…”
Section: Yukawa Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, mapping the input to the desired output in deep learning by processing through successive layers of ever increasing abstraction is conceptually similar to RG [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Applications of ML in physics include the search for eigenstates of Hamiltonians [18][19][20][21][22][23], the inverse problem of finding the parent Hamiltonian of a given state [24][25][26], predicting properties of materials [27,28], and identifying phases of matter [29][30][31][32]. In our model ML approach, the optimized probabilistic model is the desired effective model, and has physical meaning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%