2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-019-0334-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting contamination in viromes using ViromeQC

Abstract: Detecting contamination in viromes using ViromeQC To the editor Eukaryotic viruses and bacteriophages have important roles in microbiomes, but characterization of viruses in metagenomics data is difficult. Viral-like particle (VLP) purification enables enrichment for viruses from microbiome samples before sequencing but contamination can result in misleading conclusions. We present a software tool named ViromeQC for analyzing virome data. Here, we demonstrate the utility of ViromeQC by applying it to 2,050 hum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
98
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In virome generation, virion purification techniques are incorporated to remove non-encapsidated DNA (e.g., DNase treatment to remove eDNA), but nevertheless non-encapsidated DNA is still detected [183,184]. One reason for this is that eDNA, including vleDNA, can be bound to inorganic or organic compounds that can prevent its degradation.…”
Section: Removing Edna From Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In virome generation, virion purification techniques are incorporated to remove non-encapsidated DNA (e.g., DNase treatment to remove eDNA), but nevertheless non-encapsidated DNA is still detected [183,184]. One reason for this is that eDNA, including vleDNA, can be bound to inorganic or organic compounds that can prevent its degradation.…”
Section: Removing Edna From Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, PMA treatment is still useful, as one environmental metagenomic study, in which samples were collected from a clean-room floor, found that removal of relic DNA allowed detection of microbes and viruses that were not otherwise detected due to their low prevalence relative to that of relic DNA [155]. Once PMA treatment is performed, or any method of eDNA removal, qPCR can be used with 16S or 18S rRNA gene primers [184] to check to see if microbial DNA is still present in a virome, either because microbial relic DNA was not removed during PMA treatment or microbial DNA remained within intact ultrasmall microbial cells (Section 4.3).…”
Section: Removing Edna From Environmental Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a higher abundance of SSaDV could reflect important host-virus biology, it remains to be determined whether greater viral loads, determined by qPCR, of SSaDV has any biological significance. A pitfall of viral metagenomics from animal tissue using a viral enrichment method is the significant variability in non-viral genetic material between viromes within a study making quantitative comparisons difficult (33). According to our metagenomic survey, SSaDV is one species within a diverse extant population of densovirus present in sea star populations on the west coast of the United States.…”
Section: Discussion Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benchmark investigations have revealed that different viral enrichment protocols could generate different biases on the final virome product, mostly related with microbial contamination and biases against specific viruses (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). These findings call for strong caution on profiling and detection of VLPs in viromes, specifically when associations between pathologies and samples/microorganisms are claimed (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of microbial genetic material has been broadly confirmed in a recent meta-analysis of viromes studies from human, animal and environmental samples. This highlighted how enrichment protocols can hinder the correct analyses of viral communities because most of the viromes were contaminated by bacterial, archaeal and fungal genetic material (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%