2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-679x(04)75032-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Copy Number Changes in Genomic DNA: MAPH and MLPA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oligonucleotide probes may, in some cases, also lack adequate sensitivity and specificity for reliable determination of genomic target levels (see Results). By contrast, longer, single-copy DNA probes hybridized to unamplified, directlylabeled genomic targets can be used to unequivocally determine genomic copy number [Southern, 1975;White et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oligonucleotide probes may, in some cases, also lack adequate sensitivity and specificity for reliable determination of genomic target levels (see Results). By contrast, longer, single-copy DNA probes hybridized to unamplified, directlylabeled genomic targets can be used to unequivocally determine genomic copy number [Southern, 1975;White et al, 2004].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, samples with reduced probe binding for a single exon should be verified with a non-MLPA method because point variations, deletions, and insertions that span where probes bind or are close to the ligation site of a pair of probes may affect probe ligation and cause reduced signals (27,28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods have been used to analyze MLPA dosage data (27 ). In global normalization, individual peak areas are divided by the combined peak area of all probes and the resulting relative peak area is divided by relative peak areas from control DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the number of targets is higher, for instance up to 100, other technologies are of interest. Examples are bead-based platforms or multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) (10). As this test format requires a 5th to 10th of labelled DNA to hybridize, consequently the use of a mini-array system could reduce the labelling related costs to the same extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%