2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0088073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting cracks in teeth and monitoring structural integrity over time with non-invasive PTR-LUM technology a solution for a major clinical challenge

Abstract: Detecting cracks in teeth is a long-standing clinical challenge. Patients may complain of diffuse pain on chewing, pain, at times, on temperature change and pain that occurs episodically. Common diagnostic tools such as radiographs and visual examination may not detect cracks. This clinical case study shows how photothermal radiometry and luminescence (PTR-LUM), technology behind the Canary Dental Caries Detection System can detect and monitor cracks clinically as well as quantify the extent of crack. This imp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Natural teeth often exhibit hairline cracks in the dental enamel running along the long axis of the tooth (17)(18)(19). Studies show that these microfractures may not show up on bitewing radiographs (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Natural teeth often exhibit hairline cracks in the dental enamel running along the long axis of the tooth (17)(18)(19). Studies show that these microfractures may not show up on bitewing radiographs (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Natural teeth often exhibit hairline cracks in the dental enamel running along the long axis of the tooth (17)(18)(19). Studies show that these microfractures may not show up on bitewing radiographs (18,19). This implies a possible thermophotonic imaging advantage within the oral cavity due to the inability of radiographs to produce tomographic images without angular scanning, unlike the 2D eTC-PCT planar slice tomograms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%