PsycEXTRA Dataset 2001
DOI: 10.1037/e314402004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Deception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, according to Navarro and Schafer (2001), individuals trained in deception detection tend to lose their abilities over time if they do not practice what they have learned. Due to this suggestion, just-in-time training, or "training that occurs immediately before the target task takes place," (Biros et al, 2002:5) is likely to prove more effective than traditional training (Gilleard, 1996;Globerson and Korman, 2001;Lin and Su, 1998;Kester et al, 2001).…”
Section: Training To Improve Deception Detection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, according to Navarro and Schafer (2001), individuals trained in deception detection tend to lose their abilities over time if they do not practice what they have learned. Due to this suggestion, just-in-time training, or "training that occurs immediately before the target task takes place," (Biros et al, 2002:5) is likely to prove more effective than traditional training (Gilleard, 1996;Globerson and Korman, 2001;Lin and Su, 1998;Kester et al, 2001).…”
Section: Training To Improve Deception Detection Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Zuckerman and Driver (1985), verbal behaviors associated with deception include: more negative statements, increased speech errors, more speech hesitations, and increased leveling (overgeneralizations). Conveying the truth up to a certain point and the use of stalling tactics, as well as the exclusion of negative aspects of the story and an unwavering desire to fill the silence of a room (Navarro and Schafer, 2001) (Henahan, 1999). The percentages of increased indicators ranged from 63% to 1733%, with the majority of percentages over 100%.…”
Section: Deception Detection Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%