Detecting dipolarity of the geomagnetic field in the paleomagnetic record

Abstract

Recovering the geomagnetic field strength in the past is key to understanding deep Earth dynamics and detecting potential geodynamo regimes throughout the history of Earth. To better constrain the predictive power of the paleomagnetic record, we propose an approach based on the analysis of the dependency between geomagnetic field strength and inclination (angle made by the horizontal with the field lines). Based on the outcomes of statistical field models, we show that these two quantities should correlate for a wide range of Earth-like magnetic fields, even with enhanced secular variation, persistent nonzonal components, and severe noise contamination. Focusing on the paleomagnetic record, we show that the correlation is not significant for the Brunhes polarity chron, what we ascribe to inadequate spatiotemporal sampling. In contrast, the correlation is significant for the 1 to 130 Ma interval, whereas it only marginally succeeds prior to 130 Ma when strict filters on both paleointensities and paleodirections are applied. As we cannot detect significant variations in the strength of the correlation over the 1 to 130 Ma interval, we conclude that the Cretaceous Normal Superchron may not be associated with enhanced dipolarity of the geodynamo. The strong correlation obtained prior to 130 Ma when strict filters are applied indicates that the ancient field may not be on average so different from the present-day field. If long-term fluctuations nevertheless existed, detecting potential geodynamo regimes during the Precambrian is currently impeded by the sparsity of high-quality data passing strict filters in both paleointensities and paleodirections.

High‐Latitude Geomagnetic Secular Variation at the End of the Cretaceous Normal Superchron Recorded by Volcanic Flows From the Okhotsk‐Chukotka Volcanic Belt

“…Single‐crystal API determinations thus supports the existence of a correlation between chron duration and dipole moment over the past 160 Myr (Tarduno & Cottrell, 2005). In constrast, most of the recent statistical analyses of the whole‐rock API determinations tend to refute the existence of such a correlation over this time interval (e.g., Bobrovnikova et al., 2022; Di Chiara et al., 2021; Eid et al., 2022; Ingham et al., 2014; Lhuillier, Lebedev, et al., 2023, Lhuillier, Shcherbakov, & Sycheva, 2023), with the exception of Kulakov et al. (2019).…”

“…Generally, the geomagnetic field can also experience fluctuations in its average intensity F and its spatiotemporal variability during stable periods (termed hereafter paleosecular variation, PSV). Whether changes in f rev , F and PSV occur in a coupled or decoupled way is a vivid matter of debate among paleomagnetists (e.g., Cox, 1968; Doubrovine et al., 2019; Eid et al., 2022; Kulakov et al., 2019; Lhuillier, Lebedev, et al., 2023, Lhuillier, Shcherbakov, & Sycheva, 2023; McFadden et al., 1991; Tarduno et al., 2002). Conceptually, numerical dynamo simulations tend to support an increase in F with decreasing f rev or the amplitude of PSV, with a coupling controlled in first approximation by the vigor of convection (e.g., Driscoll & Olson, 2009; Lhuillier & Gilder, 2013).…”

Potential Bias in Volcanic Paleomagnetic Records Due To Superimposed Chemical Remanent Magnetization

“…The suitability of (T)CRMs for API determinations has long been debated (e.g., Baker & Muxworthy, 2023;Draeger et al, 2006;Fabian, 2009;Lhuillier et al, 2023;Smirnov & Tarduno, 2005). We recently proposed that TCRMs produced by T C increase may provide trustworthy API determinations whereas TCRMs produced by grain-size increase lead to erroneous API estimates (Shcherbakov et al, 2019(Shcherbakov et al, , 2021.…”