2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004140100228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting errors in mtDNA data by phylogenetic analysis

Abstract: Sequencing and documenting a sample of homologous DNA stretches is prone to copying errors in a way rather analogous to the biological replication process. Previous attempts at obtaining representative mtDNA sequences, typically of the control region, for evolutionary studies or forensic purposes have yielded rather unsatisfactory results in many cases. The key ingredient in pinpointing problems with given data is the phylogenetic analysis of closely related mtDNAs within the framework of an established worldw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
151
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
151
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of any partial RFLPs and HVS-II, it is difficult to decide whether a HVS-I sequence with the motif 16223-16325-16362, and additional mutations (such as one Vietnamese mtDNA from Lum et al 1998), is a member of G1a. This motif is, not unexpectedly, found twice more in 150 Japanese HVS-I sequences, but it is absent in 120 Chinese sequences of Nishimaki et al (1999), although their data have to be considered with caution in view of some likely errors (Bandelt et al 2001). …”
Section: Distinguishing Asian From Native American Mtdnasmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of any partial RFLPs and HVS-II, it is difficult to decide whether a HVS-I sequence with the motif 16223-16325-16362, and additional mutations (such as one Vietnamese mtDNA from Lum et al 1998), is a member of G1a. This motif is, not unexpectedly, found twice more in 150 Japanese HVS-I sequences, but it is absent in 120 Chinese sequences of Nishimaki et al (1999), although their data have to be considered with caution in view of some likely errors (Bandelt et al 2001). …”
Section: Distinguishing Asian From Native American Mtdnasmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This Korean data set, however, is known to contain errors (Bandelt et al 2001). There is also confusion because a more recent study by the same investigators shows a reverse pattern for the 16362 polymorphism, so that out of nine mtDNAs with the partial motif 16223-16325 seven lack the 16362 transition, whereas the other two (P173 and H120) were evidently taken from the earlier study (Lee et al 1997).…”
Section: Distinguishing Asian From Native American Mtdnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Errors detected in the data sets For many reasons, errors in the published HVS-I data were not infrequent, as was summarized by Bandelt et al (2001). By constructing a network relationship of the haplotypes (Bandelt et al 1995(Bandelt et al , 2000 and (near)matching them with published data sets, the potential errors in the data could be well distinguished.…”
Section: Haplogroup Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 -8 Substitutions at key sites were found on multiple branches of the mtDNA HVS1 network, despite being rare in other European populations. These substitutions have been described as 'phantom' mutations 6 and have been attributed to systematic sequencing errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%