2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40537-019-0194-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting high indoor crowd density with Wi-Fi localization: a statistical mechanics approach

Abstract: Crowd disasters have taken many human lives. The Love Parade disaster in Duisburg, 2010, the Ellis Park Stadium disaster in Johannesburg, 2001, the PhilSports Stadium stampede in Manila, 2006, are just a few examples. One of the major factors contributing to crowd disasters are critically dense spots [1-3], which are difficult to detect due to lack of macroscopic overview of the crowd [1]. In this paper we address the problem of estimating the crowd density distribution in situations such as indoor dance event… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, several of them focuses on studying the real effects of MAC randomization [93,94] or device de-anonymization [95,96]. There are in the literature some works that leverage PRs, e.g., in crowd detection [97] and behavior [98] or device classification [99], but we believe that there is still room for improvement.…”
Section: Rqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, several of them focuses on studying the real effects of MAC randomization [93,94] or device de-anonymization [95,96]. There are in the literature some works that leverage PRs, e.g., in crowd detection [97] and behavior [98] or device classification [99], but we believe that there is still room for improvement.…”
Section: Rqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a study carried out by (Georgievska et al, 2019) determines the prevention and warning of overcrowded events. They focus on anonymous, non-participant, and indoor estimation regarding the location of smartphones.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highly accurate, optical methods are generally limited in range by the visual cone of the individual sensors. Note that, at the price of a substantial accuracy loss, Bluetoothbased [18,19] or Wi-Fi-based [20,21] tracking enable larger spatial coverage per sensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%