2010
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1002.1827
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting highly overlapping community structure by greedy clique expansion

Abstract: In complex networks it is common for each node to belong to several communities, implying a highly overlapping community structure. Recent advances in benchmarking indicate that the existing community assignment algorithms that are capable of detecting overlapping communities perform well only when the extent of community overlap is kept to modest levels. To overcome this limitation, we introduce a new community assignment algorithm called Greedy Clique Expansion (GCE). The algorithm identifies distinct clique… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We now investigate these properties anew by modeling three social networks: Two coauthorship networks obtained from the arXiv circa 2005 [28] and from MathSciNet circa 2008 [29], as well as the email exchange network of Enron [30]. We detect their community structure with five different algorithms: A link clustering algorithm [31] (LCA), a greedy clique expansion algorithm [32] (GCE), the order statistics local optimization method [33] (OSLOM), a greedy modularity optimization of line-graphs algorithm [34] (LG), and a modified version of the classical clique percolation algorithm [28,35] (CCPA). This provides us with a total of 15 systems, from which we have selected 5 representative examples: arXiv as described by both the CCPA and LCA, Enron as described by the GCE and OSLOM algorithms, and MathSciNet as described by the GCE algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now investigate these properties anew by modeling three social networks: Two coauthorship networks obtained from the arXiv circa 2005 [28] and from MathSciNet circa 2008 [29], as well as the email exchange network of Enron [30]. We detect their community structure with five different algorithms: A link clustering algorithm [31] (LCA), a greedy clique expansion algorithm [32] (GCE), the order statistics local optimization method [33] (OSLOM), a greedy modularity optimization of line-graphs algorithm [34] (LG), and a modified version of the classical clique percolation algorithm [28,35] (CCPA). This provides us with a total of 15 systems, from which we have selected 5 representative examples: arXiv as described by both the CCPA and LCA, Enron as described by the GCE and OSLOM algorithms, and MathSciNet as described by the GCE algorithm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Greedy Clique Extension method (GCE) [20]. A method for detecting highly overlapping community structure by greedy clique expansion.…”
Section: Compared Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One stream of global algorithms attempt to find communities by optimizing an objective function. For example, GCE [14] identifies maximal cliques as seed communities. It expands these cliques by greedily optimizing a local fitness function.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%