1975
DOI: 10.1109/taes.1975.308108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Instrument Malfunctions in Control Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A. 3 The probabilities of false alarm (FA) and missed detection (MD) for each overlapping fault in both detection schemes are known (not necessarily analytically) and are monotonic functions of thresholds.…”
Section: A Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A. 3 The probabilities of false alarm (FA) and missed detection (MD) for each overlapping fault in both detection schemes are known (not necessarily analytically) and are monotonic functions of thresholds.…”
Section: A Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been proposed [1][2][3][4][5]7 to detect, diagnose, and reconfigure in the presence of faults. The Markov Decision Process (MDP) and variants have been considered to manage discrete system models, 5,8 while signal filtering, system identification, and adaptive control algorithms have been developed to manage physics-based (continuous) system models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehra & Peschon (1971) and Willsky & Jones (1974) use statistical approaches to fault diagnosis [3]. Clark, Fosth & Walton 1975) applied Luenberger observers [4]. Mironovsky (1980) proposed a residual generation scheme for the purpose of checking on the system input and output over a time limit [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Hence, the first step for failure detection is to develop a mathematical algorithm that accentuates the residual signal when a fault has occurred in a system. So far, parity space (consistency checking 4,5 ) and observer-based methods 6,7 have been widely used for the residual generation. Once residual signals are detected, the next step is to separate the source of the failure, a so-called fault isolation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%