2016 IEEE International Symposium on Defect and Fault Tolerance in VLSI and Nanotechnology Systems (DFT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/dft.2016.7684075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting intermittent resistive faults in digital CMOS circuits

Abstract: Interconnection reliability threats dependability of highly critical electronic systems. One of most challenging interconnection-induced reliability threats are intermittent resistive faults (IRFs). The occurrence rate of this kind of defects can take e.g. one month, and the duration of defects can be as short as a few nanoseconds. As a result, evoking and detecting these faults is a big challenge. IRFs can cause timing deviations in data paths in digital systems during its operating time. This paper proposes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Timing violation along a data path can occur due to process, voltage and temperature variations, aging and IRF [7]. In-situ on-line monitoring techniques can be used for timing-error detection and correction in critical paths [4], timing slack measurements [6], adaptive voltage scaling [8], aging detection [9] and IRF detection as well [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Timing violation along a data path can occur due to process, voltage and temperature variations, aging and IRF [7]. In-situ on-line monitoring techniques can be used for timing-error detection and correction in critical paths [4], timing slack measurements [6], adaptive voltage scaling [8], aging detection [9] and IRF detection as well [3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, conventional test methods are highly unlikely to detect these faults. Two alternative methods for intermittent fault detection are periodic testing [2] and in-situ on-line monitoring [3]. The periodic testing method is basically retesting the system periodically which increases the probability of detecting intermittent faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 With some modi¯cations, the in situ on-line monitoring techniques can be used for IRF detection at the chip levels as well. 5 For adapting on-line monitoring techniques for IRF detection, we need to focus on the di®erence between intermittent faults and other timing faults. The main di®erence is that IRFs can cause random timing violations.…”
Section: To Monitor Degradation In Connectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IRFs have been modeled based on some IRF measurements. 2,5 In this model, a burst of IRF pulses is generated based on six parameters. These parameters are the following: The number of pulses in a burst (burst length).…”
Section: Intermittent Resistive Faults Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, we discovered the most sensitive parts to IRFs, which subsequently was extended to real hardware measurements, including the implementation of an IRF fault generator [EBR16a], showing indeed the predicted failures in a CMOS universal asynchronous receiver/transmitter (UART). The next step was the development of an IRF detector [EBR16b] which can start-up a logging of environmental conditions, thereby enhancing the diagnostic capabilities significantly.…”
Section: A Investigation Of the No Fault Found Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%