2017
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2017.2666772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Localized Categorical Attributes on Graphs

Abstract: Abstract-Do users from Carnegie Mellon University form social communities on Facebook? Do signal processing researchers from tightly collaborate with each other? Do Chinese restaurants in Manhattan cluster together? These seemingly different problems share a common structure: an attribute that may be localized on a graph. In other words, nodes activated by an attribute form a subgraph that can be easily separated from other nodes. In this paper, we thus focus on the task of detecting localized attributes on a … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By default, we set σ = 0.2, b = 0.2. For binary graph signals, we consider adding Bernoulli noise [23]; that is, we randomly select a subset of vertices and flip the associated binary values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By default, we set σ = 0.2, b = 0.2. For binary graph signals, we consider adding Bernoulli noise [23]; that is, we randomly select a subset of vertices and flip the associated binary values.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is similar to localizing an activated piece, it is either computationally inefficient or hindered by strong assumptions. For example, in [39], the authors analyze the theoretical performance of detecting paths, blobs and spatial temporal sets by exhaustive search, resulting in a costly algorithm, while in [42], [43], the authors aim to detect a node set with a specific cut number, resulting in a computationally efficient algorithm, but limited by strong assumptions.…”
Section: Signal Localization On Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can adaptively update the edge weights by using graph signal coefficients and solve (4) by using efficient graph-cut solvers. Inspired by [42], [43], we add the number of edges connecting activated and inactivated nodes to the objective function to induce a connected component. Let ∆ ∈ R M ×N be the graph incidence matrix of G [54].…”
Section: Signal Localization On Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A closely related line of work considers the problem of detecting signals in irregular domains [34]- [39]. In particular, [40], [41] consider optimal random walk detection on a graph which is closely related to the problem of path localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%