2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-021-00498-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting, localizing, and quantifying damage using two-dimensional sensing sheet: lab test and field application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strain field mapping provides a comprehensive distribution of strain across an entire structure, thus opens up numerous opportunities that cannot be achieved by conventional discrete strain sensors. It validates the outcomes of finite element analysis (FEA) simulations and enhances confidence in results 1 , 2 , It enables timely detection of structural anomalies in structural health monitoring 3 , 4 , and aids in health condition assessment by identifying heterogeneous deformations in human body 5 . Currently, optical methods are predominantly used for full-field strain mapping due to their high spatial resolution 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Strain field mapping provides a comprehensive distribution of strain across an entire structure, thus opens up numerous opportunities that cannot be achieved by conventional discrete strain sensors. It validates the outcomes of finite element analysis (FEA) simulations and enhances confidence in results 1 , 2 , It enables timely detection of structural anomalies in structural health monitoring 3 , 4 , and aids in health condition assessment by identifying heterogeneous deformations in human body 5 . Currently, optical methods are predominantly used for full-field strain mapping due to their high spatial resolution 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Figure S18c (Supporting Information) shows the change in the relative resistance response, which can be explained by the low viscosity after treatment which affects the low area of contact in the 45° direction, resulting in change surface area, compared to the hydrogel before treatment. [ 49,50 ] Figure S18d (Supporting Information) further highlights the increased responsiveness of the GSH‐treated M‐Hydrogel, as it can detect a drop of water falling on it compared to the untreated hydrogel. [ 45,51 ] The higher responsiveness demonstrated by the M‐Hydrogel after GSH treatment was attributed to the release of cPDA, which contributes toward a higher conductivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a fatigue crack occurs, strain measurements can be effective for crack detection and monitoring because of the sensitivity of strain change to the opening and closing of the crack, especially when the strain sensors are installed close to the crack [ 18 ]. However, the point and distributed one-dimensional sensors may not provide adequate information for fatigue crack monitoring since their small sizes hinder their ability to cover an adequate surface of fatigue crack prone areas [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Moreover, the limited ductility of those sensors causes them to fail under the extreme strain demand due to crack formation, and using a dense array of them to cover large areas to provide adequate surface coverage may be impractical and expensive [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the point and distributed one-dimensional sensors may not provide adequate information for fatigue crack monitoring since their small sizes hinder their ability to cover an adequate surface of fatigue crack prone areas [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Moreover, the limited ductility of those sensors causes them to fail under the extreme strain demand due to crack formation, and using a dense array of them to cover large areas to provide adequate surface coverage may be impractical and expensive [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation