2020 International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT-1441) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccit-144147971.2020.9213792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Malicious URL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset employed was the Malicious and Benign Webpages Dataset, a publicly available dataset released by Singh and Kumar in 2020 [ 4 ]. The data were collected by crawling the Internet using the Mal Crawler tool [ 28 ], and the labels were verified (as good or bad) using Google Safe Browsing (API).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dataset employed was the Malicious and Benign Webpages Dataset, a publicly available dataset released by Singh and Kumar in 2020 [ 4 ]. The data were collected by crawling the Internet using the Mal Crawler tool [ 28 ], and the labels were verified (as good or bad) using Google Safe Browsing (API).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the idea that features engineering plays a vital role in the performance of classifiers, our paper aims to extract different URL features, namely, lexical, network-based, and content-based features to help the classifier identify malicious URLs accurately. We apply these methods on a dataset constructed by Alkhudair et al [ 4 ], which to the best of our knowledge has not been used in the papers mentioned above to apply ML and DL classification models. Furthermore, we carry out a series of experiments to select the features selection technique that yields the best results with a high level of accuracy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandag et al [35] applied the k-NN method to website features and attained 95% accuracy. Alkhudair et al [36] and Panischev et al [37] proposed methods using RF to obtain 95% accuracy for both studies. Labhsetwar et al [38] achieved 92% accuracy by using an RF classifier.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study formulated by Zamir et al [24] proposed a framework to detect phishing websites using a stacking model. The used dataset is Kaggle [25]. They extracted 32 content, lexical, and network features.…”
Section: ) Lexical Content-based and Network-based Features Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%