Detecting micro fractures: a comprehensive comparison of conventional and machine-learning-based segmentation methods

Abstract

Abstract. Studying porous rocks with X-ray computed tomography (XRCT) has been established as a standard procedure for the non-destructive characterization of flow and transport in porous media. Despite the recent advances in the field of XRCT, various challenges still remain due to the inherent noise and imaging artifacts in the produced data. These issues become even more profound when the objective is the identification of fractures and/or fracture networks. One challenge is the limited contrast between the regions of interest and the neighboring areas, which can mostly be attributed to the minute aperture of the fractures. In order to overcome this challenge, it has been a common approach to apply various digital image processing steps, such as filtering, to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, segmentation methods based on threshold/morphology schemes have been employed to obtain enhanced information from the features of interest. However, this workflow needs a skillful operator to fine-tune its input parameters, and the required computation time significantly increases due to the complexity of the available methods and the large volume of an XRCT dataset. In this study, based on a dataset produced by the successful visualization of a fracture network in Carrara marble with micro X-ray computed tomography (μXRCT), we present the results from five segmentation methods, three conventional and two machine-learning-based ones. The objective is to provide the interested reader with a comprehensive comparison between existing approaches while presenting the operating principles, advantages and limitations, to serve as a guide towards an individualized segmentation workflow. The segmentation results from all five methods are compared to each other in terms of quality and time efficiency. Due to memory limitations, and in order to accomplish a fair comparison, all the methods are employed in a 2D scheme. The output of the 2D U-net model, which is one of the adopted machine-learning-based segmentation methods, shows the best performance regarding the quality of segmentation and the required processing time.

An Object‐Based Approach to Differentiate Pores and Microfractures in Petrographic Analysis Using Explainable, Supervised Machine Learning

“…Given that these features are ostensibly geometric end members, it is more prudent to approach this problem prior to drawing finer distinctions in pore types using multiclass ML frameworks. Macrofracture segmentation studies follow this template with emphasis on extracting the macrofractures in microCT models by all possible means, with the other class inherently being pores (Lee et al., 2021). Ideally, enhancing the separation of microfractures and pores into natural clusters in the feature space should be prioritized.…”

An object-based approach to differentiate pores and microfractures in petrographic analysis using explainable, supervised machine learning

“…Given that these features are ostensibly geometric end members, it is more prudent to approach this problem prior to drawing finer distinctions in pore types using multiclass ML frameworks. Macrofracture segmentation studies follow this template with emphasis on extracting the macrofractures in microCT models by all possible means, with the other class inherently being pores (Lee et al, 2021). Ideally, enhancing the separation of microfractures and pores into natural clusters in the feature space should be prioritized.…”

From fluid flow to coupled processes in fractured rock: recent advances and new frontiers

“…CT allows direct visualization of fracture apertures in their natural state without piecing the two sides of the fracture together, but at the cost of a generally lower resolution of fracture roughness. High-fidelity analysis of fracture apertures requires optimizing CT image quality (Cnudde & Boone, 2013;Ketcham & Carlson, 2001;Noiriel, 2015;Wildenschild & Sheppard, 2013;Withers et al, 2021) as well as the use of fracture-specific CT segmentation strategies (Deng et al, 2016;Huo et al, 2016;Johns et al, 1993;Ketcham et al, 2010;Lee et al, 2021;Voorn et al, 2013). One of the key innovations is using "missing attenuation"…”