2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41437-021-00436-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting purging of inbreeding depression by a slow rate of inbreeding for various traits: the impact of environmental and experimental conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the inbred lines displayed inbreeding depression rates (B) for EAV in line with similar studies on D. melanogaster (Bundgaard et al, 2021;Enders & Nunney, 2010Schou et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the inbred lines displayed inbreeding depression rates (B) for EAV in line with similar studies on D. melanogaster (Bundgaard et al, 2021;Enders & Nunney, 2010Schou et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, the inbred lines displayed inbreeding depression rates (B) for EAV in line with similar studies on D . melanogaster (Bundgaard et al, 2021; Enders & Nunney, 2010, 2012; Schou et al, 2015). Nonetheless, a large variation in inbreeding depression estimates was seen among different inbred lines, for both traits, despite an expected constant inbreeding level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, purging during ex situ conservation is not expected to act upon traits that are not expressed in captivity but that could be fitness components in the wild. For example, the inbreeding load for heat shock resistance in Drosophila was not purged in lines that had been maintained in stable lab conditions (Bundgaard et al 2021). However, mutation is expected to produce unconditionally deleterious alleles much more often than alleles that are deleterious in some conditions but advantageous in others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the managed population is reintroduced into the wild, it is expected that the fitness effects of past purging will change, as the expression of the inbreeding load depends on the environment (Kristensen, Loeschcke & Hoffmann, 2008; Cheptou & Donohue, 2011; Reed et al ., 2012; Pemberton et al ., 2017). For example, no purging has been detected for specific traits that are not expressed during the purging process as heat shock resistance (Bijlsma, Bundgaard & Van Putten, 1999; Bundgaard et al ., 2021). However, even though adaptation to captive conditions is likely to imply some detriment to adaptation in the wild, this trade‐off can depend on just a small fraction of the mutations affecting fitness which do not need to make substantial contributions to the fitness inbreeding load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%