2016
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting QTLs and putative candidate genes involved in budbreak and flowering time in an apple multiparental population

Abstract: HighlightQTLs and candidate genes for the regulation of budbreak and flowering time reveal new hypotheses on temperature perception in growth resumption at spring time in apple.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
92
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
8
92
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of these populations have also been used in studies on the development of multiplexes of SSR markers, 42 validation of the pedigree-based analyses approach for QTL mapping on multiple pedigreed families 13 and QTL discovery for horticultural traits. 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of these populations have also been used in studies on the development of multiplexes of SSR markers, 42 validation of the pedigree-based analyses approach for QTL mapping on multiple pedigreed families 13 and QTL discovery for horticultural traits. 18 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QTL on LG9 for entropy appeared as a new zone of importance, as it co-localized with a major QTL detected for the timing of vegetative and flowering bud break (Dyk et al, 2010; Celton et al, 2011; Allard et al, 2016). New QTLs were also detected for BBIs on LG5 and LG7, consistently with “Starkrimson® Red Delicious” and “Granny Smith” not being heterozygous for these QTLs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCMC algorithms and details on the monitoring of Monte Carlo accuracy and length of the simulation chains can be found in Bink et al (2008) and Allard et al (2016), respectively. The number of QTLs was inferred from a pairwise comparison of models differing by one QTL, and considering twice the natural logarithm of the Bayes Factors (Kass and Raftery, 1995), denoted 2 * lnBF.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 6849 polymorphic SNPs, 3123 were used in this study, after a careful checking of their robustness consistency (Van de Weg et al, 2013; Di Guardo et al, 2015) and recombination pattern (Allard et al, 2016). In particular, all markers which were not strictly bi-allelic in at least one of the parent were discarded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%