2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting snowfall over land by satellite high‐frequency microwave observations: The lack of scattering signature and a statistical approach

Abstract: [1] It has been long believed that the dominant microwave signature of snowfall over land is the brightness temperature decrease caused by ice scattering. However, our analysis of multiyear satellite data revealed that on most of occasions, brightness temperatures are rather higher under snowfall than nonsnowfall conditions, likely due to the emission by cloud liquid water. This brightness temperature increase masks the scattering signature and complicates the snowfall detection problem. In this study, we prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
75
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This again confirms previous studies [19,20] showing TB and ∆TB enhancement at 150 GHz in presence of snowfall, while damping of the polarization signal was observed in the presence of supercooled water. This also confirms the finding by Liu and Seo [44] that describes an emission signal at high frequencies in the winter associated with snowfall in the presence of a frozen surface background (low moisture and cold conditions). This effect was not visible at 166 GHz for the 30 April 2014 case study previously described because of the high TPW.…”
Section: Case 2: Orographic Precipitation Event On 14 December 2014supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This again confirms previous studies [19,20] showing TB and ∆TB enhancement at 150 GHz in presence of snowfall, while damping of the polarization signal was observed in the presence of supercooled water. This also confirms the finding by Liu and Seo [44] that describes an emission signal at high frequencies in the winter associated with snowfall in the presence of a frozen surface background (low moisture and cold conditions). This effect was not visible at 166 GHz for the 30 April 2014 case study previously described because of the high TPW.…”
Section: Case 2: Orographic Precipitation Event On 14 December 2014supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The presence of supercooled water near cloud tops in these shallow clouds has been verified using the CloudSat CPR/CALIPSO DARDAR product as shown in Figure 2a (magenta color layers in the top panel). In the work by Liu and Seo [44], similar TB increases was noted due to cloud liquid water that often mask frozen hydrometeor scattering effects and further complicate high microwave frequency TB signatures associated with snowfall events.…”
Section: Case 1: Intense Snowfall Event On 30 April 2014mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…These sensors have high frequency channels that are highly sensitive to snowfall due to the scattering by snowflakes of upwelling terrestrial and radiation, originating in the lower levels of the atmosphere [15][16][17][18]. In addition, passive microwave radiometers have a large swath and have been installed on many platforms over the last decades, ensuring a good global coverage with a fair spatial resolution and lengthy data records.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, several approaches have been proposed in recent years for detecting and retrieving snowfall using passive microwave radiometers, such as the Special Sensor Microwave-Humidity (SSM/T2) [19], Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit-B (AMSU-B) and Microwave Humidity Sounding (MHS) [5,16,[20][21][22], Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) [23,24], Special Sensor Microwave-Imager/Sounder (SSMIS) [25] and GMI [26] (Figure 1). In addition, to these passive microwave products, specifically dedicated to snowfall, some operational products provide estimations of precipitation, including snowfall at the global scale, combining observations of several radiometers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous efforts have been put into the use of passive microwave sensors (e.g., AMSR-E, AMSU, and TMI) for detecting snowfall or snow cover and retrieving snow depth, snow water equivalent (SWE), or snowfall rate [8][9][10][11][12][13]. Active microwave sensors also have a great potential in measuring snow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%